CONVERTING THE UNIVERSE FROM EXPANDING TO STATIC VIA SPACE-TIME'S GEOMETRY, TOPOLOGY, REDSHIFT, AND ELECTROMAGNETISM

I don't dispute the online articles that state the James Webb Space Telescope never disproved the Big Bang. But that doesn't mean the idea of an expanding universe is correct (neither do I believe it can contract or oscillate, as plasma cosmology – the electric universe theory - states). This article refers to a paper in “Physics Reports” that says a flat universe that is also simply connected implies an infinite universe. “Flat” here means the overall shape of the universe is flat – Einstein’s curvature of space-time in General Relativity still exists but the universe is regarded as mathematical with positive and negative curvatures cancelling to produce overall flatness. This maths embraces the topological Mobius strip and figure-8 Klein bottle (two joined strips). The Klein bottle is a closed surface with no distinction between inside and outside. What is supposed to be outside the thickness of the figure-8 Klein bottles composing our universe [either another universe in the multiverse or the Klein's exterior void, and the interior multiverse member or the Klein's central hole) would be the same as what exists within that surface. This results in the space-time (and microwave background) of our universe existing everywhere and everywhen. The inside and outside of the universe are continuous when it's composed of Mobius strips and figure-8 Klein bottles - there cannot be other universes outside our infinite and eternal universe. When we solve (19th-century Scottish physicist James Clerk) Maxwell's equations for light, we find not one but two solutions: a 'retarded' wave, which represents the standard motion of light from one point to another; but also an 'advanced' wave, where the light beam goes backward in time. The farther away a star or galaxy is, the more the advanced part of waves from it will reach into the past, giving us a greater inaccuracy regarding its true distance. This increase is analogous to redshift increasing with distance. We might call it readshift - re(tarded) ad(vanced) shift. Readshift would explain the astronomical results which were interpreted as accelerating expansion of the universe. Surveyed supernovas would appear fainter, therefore apparently farther away than they truly are. Unless advanced waves are considered a possibility, the only rational way to move a supernova from its apparent, distant position to its true nearer location is to conclude the universe has expanded.