Comparison between Pulsed Radio-Frequency Plus Steroid Injection and Thermal Radio-Frequency in Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia
Creators
- 1. MBChB, FICMS, Senior specialist in anesthesia & interventional pain management Rizgary hospital , Erbil, KRI, Iraq
- 2. MBChB, FICMS, Chairman of Iraqi Council of Regional Anesthesia and Interventional Pain Management, Medical City Complex Nursing Home Hospital ,Baghdad Iraq
- 3. MBChB, FICMS, FIPP, Senior Specialist in Anesthesia & Interventional Pain Management Head of Pain Management Unit, Rizgary Hospital , Erbil, KRI, IRAQ
- 4. MBChB, CABA and IC. Arab Council of Interventional Pain Management Baghdad Medical City Complex. Nursing home Hospital, Baghdad Iraq
Description
Comparison between Pulsed Radio-Frequency Plus Steroid Injection and Thermal Radio-Frequency in Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia
Hevy Sherko Fathulla1, Mortada Abdulhussien Jubara2, Bnar Halko Ahmad Shawqi3, Ghassan Faris Idan4
1. MBChB, FICMS, Senior specialist in anesthesia & interventional pain management Rizgary hospital , Erbil, KRI, Iraq
2. MBChB, FICMS, Chairman of Iraqi Council of Regional Anesthesia and Interventional Pain Management, Medical City Complex Nursing Home Hospital ,Baghdad Iraq
3. MBChB, FICMS, FIPP, Senior Specialist in Anesthesia & Interventional Pain Management Head of Pain Management Unit, Rizgary Hospital , Erbil, KRI, IRAQ
4. MBChB, CABA and IC. Arab Council of Interventional Pain Management Baghdad Medical City Complex. Nursing home Hospital, Baghdad Iraq
*Corresponding Author , contact email : drhevysherko@gmail.com
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6886620
Abstract
Background: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a common chronic neuropathic pain that seriously affects the daily life of the patient. Many invasive treatment are currently available. One of the treatment options is radiofrequency for immediate and long term pain relief .
Objectives: To evaluate outcome of comparison between pulse radiofrequency with steroid injection and thermal radiofrequency alone in treating patients complain of trigeminal neuralgia for getting better result (pain free )for longer duration and less recurrence.
Patients and Methods: A prospective study included 40 adult patients, assigned into two groups ; to managed either with pulse radiofrequency with lidocaine and steroid injection, or thermal radiofrequency alone, and followed up for at least 1 year post- intervention , during which, time and pain relief were recorded with checking complications and recurrence time with dose of carbamazepine.
Result : In group 1, all patients got Immediate pain relive while in group 2 only 50% while the remaining 50% in this group got pain relive within 1 month. Recurrence in group 1 occurred after 2 years while in group 2 it occurred in less or around 1 year but they needed lower dose of tegretol. Fortunately, no mortalities reported in both groups.
Conclusions: patients gets better result in treatment resistance cases of trigeminal neuralgia when use pulse radiofrequency with lidocaine and steroid inaction related to time of immediate decrease of pain ,longer duration pain free and longer recurrence time.
Notes
Files
Comparison between Pulsed Radio-Frequency Plus Steroid Injection and Thermal Radio-Frequency in Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia.pdf
Files
(729.4 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:0cf55cc16c4c38121cb0b2beb00993b6
|
729.4 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- 1. Edvinsson JCA, Viganò A, Alekseeva A, Alieva E, Arruda R, De Luca C, et al. The fifth cranial nerve in headaches. J Headache Pain. 2020;21(1):1–17
- 2. Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society. The international classification of headache disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia. 2004;24 (Suppl 1):9–160. Cephalalgia. 2004;24(suppl 1):9–160.
- 3. Abdel‐Rahman KA, Elawamy AM, Mostafa MF, Hasan WS, Herdan R, Osman NM, et al. Combined pulsed and thermal radiofrequency versus thermal radiofrequency alone in the treatment of recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression: a double blinded comparative study. Eur J Pain. 2020;24(2):338–45.
- 4. Maarbjerg S, Gozalov A, Olesen J, Bendtsen L. Trigeminal neuralgia–a prospective systematic study of clinical characteristics in 158 patients. Headache J Head Face Pain. 2014;54(10):1574–82.
- 5. Cruccu G, Biasiotta A, Galeotti F, Iannetti GD, Truini A, Gronseth G. Diagnostic accuracy of trigeminal reflex testing in trigeminal neuralgia. Neurology. 2006;66(1):139–41.
- 6. De Simone R, Marano E, Brescia Morra V, Ranieri A, Ripa P, Esposito M, et al. A clinical comparison of trigeminal neuralgic pain in patients with and without underlying multiple sclerosis. Neurol Sci. 2005;26(2):s150–1.
- 7. MacDonald BK, Cockerell OC, Sander J, Shorvon SD. The incidence and lifetime prevalence of neurological disorders in a prospective community-based study in the UK. Brain. 2000;123(4):665–76.
- 8. Mueller D, Obermann M, Yoon M-S, Poitz F, Hansen N, Slomke M-A, et al. Prevalence of trigeminal neuralgia and persistent idiopathic facial pain: a population-based study. Cephalalgia. 2011;31(15):1542–8.
- 9. Katusic S, Beard CM, Bergstralth E, Kurland LT. Incidence and clinical features of trigeminal neuralgia, Rochester, Minnesota, 1945–1984. Ann Neurol Off J Am Neurol Assoc Child Neurol Soc. 1990;27(1):89–95.
- 10. Maarbjerg S, Di Stefano G, Bendtsen L, Cruccu G. Trigeminal neuralgia–diagnosis and treatment. Cephalalgia. 2017;37(7):648–57
- Full List of References available at http://www.jmsps.org/current/