Published July 19, 2022 | Version v1
Book chapter Open

The execution of financial penalties imposed based on vehicle registration data, a commentary on the CJEU judgment C-671/18 in the case Centraal Justitieel Incassobureau

Description

This article comments on the 5th of December 2019 CJEU judgment in the case C-671/18, where the Court resolved doubts as to whether, in accordance with EU law, it is possible to impose a financial penalty for a road traffic offence on a person designated on the basis of a legal presumption as the owner of a car by the register of vehicles of another Member State. This judgment was based on the provisions of Article 7(2)(g) and Article 20(3) of the Council Framework Decision, 2005/214/JHA, of 24 February 2005 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties. The Court concluded that a financial penalty issued in another Member State should be executed, even if the person sentenced (punished) presents a certificate demonstrating that he or she was not the owner of the vehicle. In the text below the consequences of this attitude will be presented, as well as both the negative and positive arguments as to the way of reasoning of the Court.

Files

7 Kuczynska The execution of finacial.pdf

Files (313.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:9fa5ceeace26883c1602ccdd7a1ff3f8
313.6 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Council Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA of 24 February 2005 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties [2005] OJ L 76/16
  • Directive (EU) 2015/413 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2015 facilitating cross-border exchange of information on road-safety-related traffic offences [2015] OJ L 68/9
  • Case C432/05 Unibet, EU:C:2007:163
  • Case C279/09 DEB, EU:C:2010:811
  • Case C396/11 Radu, EU:C:2013:39
  • Case C625/11 PPG and SNF v ECHA, EU:C:2013:594
  • Case C60/12 Baláž, EU:C:2013:733
  • Case C354/15 Henderson, EU:C:2017:157
  • Joined Cases C124/16, C188/16 and C213/16 Tranca and others, EU:C:2017:228
  • Case C64/16 Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses, EU:C:2018:117
  • Case C-671/18 Centraal Justitieel Incassobureau, EU:C:2019:1054
  • Falk v the Netherlands App no 66273/01 (ECtHR, 19 October 2004)
  • Decision of 19 January 2021, III KK 130/20, [2021] (3) Orzecznictwo Sądu Najwyższego w sprawach Karnych i Wojskowych
  • Kuczyńska H, 'Współpraca międzynarodowa w sprawach wykroczeń' in M Kolendowska- Matejczuk, V Vachev (eds), Węzłowe problemy prawa wykroczeń – czy potrzebna jest reforma? (Biuro Rzecznika Praw Obywatelskich 2016)
  • Luchtman M, 'Transnational Law Enforcement Cooperation – Fundamental Rights in European Cooperation in Criminal Matters' (2020) 1 European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice
  • Mitsilegas V, 'The European Model of Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters: Towards Effectiveness based on Earned Trust' (2019) 2 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal
  • Grajewski J, Paprzycki L K, Steinborn S (eds), Kodeks postępowania karnego. Komentarz, Vol. II (Wolters Kluwer Polska 2013)
  • Stefaniak-Dąbrowska M, 'Wzajemne uznawanie orzeczeń nakładających kary pieniężne w świetle standardów procesowych Unii Europejskiej' [2020] (9) Europejski Przegląd Sądowy Grajewski J, Paprzycki L K, Steinborn S (eds), Kodeks postępowania karnego. Komentarz, Vol. II (Wolters Kluwer Polska 2013)
  • Wahl T, 'CJEU: No Loopholes against Enforcement of Foreign Fines' [2019] (4) EUCRIM
  • Auto-Świat, 'Dostajemy coraz więcej mandatów z zagranicy' <https://www.auto-swiat. pl/wiadomosci/aktualnosci/dostajemy-coraz-wiecej-mandatow-z-zagranicy-prawie- 2-mln-w-2019-roku/nn9fvsz> accessed 2 January 2022
  • Centraal Justitieel Incassobureau (CJIB), Exécution des sanctions pécuniaires <https://eclan.eu/en/eu-case-law/centraal-justitieel-incassobureau-cjib-executiondes- sanctions-pecuniaires> accessed 26 January 2022