Book section Open Access
Princ, Marcin
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd"> <identifier identifierType="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.6609464</identifier> <creators> <creator> <creatorName>Princ, Marcin</creatorName> <givenName>Marcin</givenName> <familyName>Princ</familyName> </creator> </creators> <titles> <title>Power of attorney in administrative procedures: General principles and credibility assessment</title> </titles> <publisher>Zenodo</publisher> <publicationYear>2022</publicationYear> <dates> <date dateType="Issued">2022-12-03</date> </dates> <language>en</language> <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="BookChapter"/> <alternateIdentifiers> <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://zenodo.org/record/6609464</alternateIdentifier> </alternateIdentifiers> <relatedIdentifiers> <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsVersionOf">10.5281/zenodo.6609463</relatedIdentifier> </relatedIdentifiers> <rightsList> <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</rights> <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights> </rightsList> <descriptions> <description descriptionType="Abstract"><p>A party&rsquo;s proxy often plays a very important role in administrative proceedings, including in the course of&nbsp;applying for international protection. The institution of a proxy is closely related to the need to strengthen&nbsp;the position of a party to proceedings vis-&agrave;-vis the public administration. One has to fully agree with the&nbsp;statement that &lsquo;the right to support and representation is recognised as one of the canons of administrative&nbsp;proceedings in view of European standards&rsquo;,5 and the right to appoint an attorney guarantees &lsquo;a fuller realisation&nbsp;of the principle of active participation of a party in administrative proceedings&rsquo;.</p></description> <description descriptionType="Other">{"references": ["H. Knysiak-Molczyk (2013). 'Konstrukcja prawna pe\u0142nomocnictwa procesowego' [Legal structure of the power of attorney]. In: K. Knysiak-Molczyk (ed.). Czynno\u015bci procesowe zawodowego pe\u0142nomocnika w sprawach administracyjnych i s\u0105dowoadministracyjnych [Procedural acts of a professional representative in administrative and judicial-administrative cases]. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer.", "H. Knysiak-Sudyka (ed.) (2020). Pe\u0142nomocnik strony w post\u0119powaniu administracyjnym i s\u0105dowo administracyjnym [Proxy in administrative and administrative court proceedings]. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer.", "M. Szubiakowski In: M. Wierzbowski (ed.) (2017). Post\u0119powanie administracyjne - og\u00f3lne, podatkowe, egzekucyjne i przed s\u0105dami administracyjnymi [Administrative procedure: General, tax, enforcement and administrative courts]. Warsaw: C.H. Beck.", "J. Chlebny In: J. Chlebny, W. Chr\u00f3\u015bcielewski, P. Da\u0144czak, P. D\u0105browski, A. Liszewska, R. Rogala (2020). Prawo o cudzoziemcach: komentarz [Law on Foreigners: Commentary]. Warsaw: CH Beck.", "Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court in Warsaw of 29 April 1998, IV SA 1044/96, LEX 45639.", "P.M. Przybysz In: Code of Administrative Procedure. Commentary updated, LEX/el. 2021.", "Z. Janowicz (1999). Kodeks post\u0119powania administracyjnego. Komentarz [Code of Administrative Procedure: Commentary]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Prawnicze PWN.", "Judgment of the NSA in Warsaw of 16 June 1998, III SA 1597/96, LEX 35482.", "Judgment of the NSA of 29 July 2016, II FSK 87/16, LEX 2101631.", "A. Wr\u00f3bel In: M. Ja\u015bkowska, M. Wilbrandt-Gotowicz, A. Wr\u00f3bel (2020). Kodeks post\u0119powania administracyjnego. Komentarz [Code of Administrative Procedure: Commentary]. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer, LEX.", "A. Gol\u0119ba In: H. Knysiak-Sudyka (ed.) (2019). Kodeks post\u0119powania administracyjnego. Komentarz [Code of Administrative Procedure: Commentary]. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer, LEX.", "Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of 29 July 2016, II FSK 87/16, LEX 2101631."]}</description> </descriptions> </resource>
All versions | This version | |
---|---|---|
Views | 20 | 20 |
Downloads | 13 | 13 |
Data volume | 2.1 MB | 2.1 MB |
Unique views | 17 | 17 |
Unique downloads | 11 | 11 |