Other Open Access

12 Quality criteria for online science communication

Ecsite


MARC21 XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <leader>00000nkm##2200000uu#4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20220524144610.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="001">6576619</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">641533</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">md5:c2682f1524b026fa821c0a03f8027ff2</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">https://zenodo.org/record/6576619/files/RETHINK_Capsules_WP3.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">open</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2022-05-24</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="p">user-rethink</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">oai:zenodo.org:6576619</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Ecsite</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">12 Quality criteria for online science communication</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">user-rethink</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="536" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">824573</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">RETHINK</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">opendefinition.org</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">&lt;p&gt;Which criteria do experts consider as most important to evaluate quality in science communication online? We conducted a Delphi study to examine their opinions. The study encompassed two waves of surveys with 26 (wave 1) and 19 (wave 2) science communciation scholars from across the world and resulted in 12 quality criteria for online science communication.&lt;/p&gt;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="n">doi</subfield>
    <subfield code="i">isVersionOf</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.6576618</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.6576619</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">image</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">other</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
25
16
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 2525
Downloads 1616
Data volume 10.3 MB10.3 MB
Unique views 2424
Unique downloads 1616

Share

Cite as