May 21, 2022 Preprint Open Access

Crameri, Fabio

JSON-LD (schema.org) Export

{
  "inLanguage": {
    "alternateName": "eng", 
    "@type": "Language", 
    "name": "English"
  }, 
  "description": "<p>Academia evaluation is currently done by ranking&nbsp;academics, mainly&nbsp;on the basis&nbsp;on one single, flawed number, the h-index.&nbsp;<strong><em>Pro</em>Ac</strong> (<a href=\"https://www.fabiocrameri.ch/proac\">www.fabiocrameri.ch/proac</a>),&nbsp;a data-based, visual toolbox that <strong>allows to profile academics</strong> based on not just one, but a selection of elaborate metrics. Crucially, this will reduce unnecessary competition between academics and current ranking biases, and foster high-quality, instead of high-quantity, research.</p>", 
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode", 
  "creator": [
    {
      "affiliation": "Undertone.design", 
      "@id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1989-2729", 
      "@type": "Person", 
      "name": "Crameri, Fabio"
    }
  ], 
  "headline": "Academic profiling, instead of ranking, with ProAc", 
  "image": "https://zenodo.org/static/img/logos/zenodo-gradient-round.svg", 
  "datePublished": "2022-05-21", 
  "url": "https://zenodo.org/record/6569100", 
  "version": "0.1.0", 
  "keywords": [
    "ProAc", 
    "academia", 
    "academic profiling", 
    "academic profile", 
    "Fabio Crameri", 
    "h-index", 
    "i10-index", 
    "academic ranking", 
    "academic evaluation", 
    "science metrics", 
    "research assessment"
  ], 
  "@context": "https://schema.org/", 
  "identifier": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6569100", 
  "@id": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6569100", 
  "@type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
  "name": "Academic profiling, instead of ranking, with ProAc"
}