6516027
doi
10.5281/zenodo.6516027
oai:zenodo.org:6516027
user-ipbes
Agnes Pawlowska-Mainville
Fernanda Rios
Elise Delgoulet
Alice Millington
Jorge Llopis
Tim Baird
Sushma Shrestha
Fred Saunders
Gabby Ahmadia
Supin Wongbusarakum
Natalie Kurashima
Kawika B. Winter
Mehana B. Vaughn
Harold Eyster
David González-Jiménez
Rachel Neugarten
IPBES VA Chapter 4 - Literature & case study review on outcomes in protected areas and indigenous and community conserved areas (ICCAs)
Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer
doi:10.5281/zenodo.6522261
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
IPBES
Values Assessment
Chapter 4
<p><strong>IPBES VA Chapter 4 - Literature & case study review on outcomes in protected areas and indigenous and community conserved areas (ICCAs) / IPBES values assessment (4.6)</strong></p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Code: </strong>IPBES_VA_4.6</p>
<p><strong>Versioning 01:</strong> (24.11.2020)</p>
<p><strong>Versioning 02:</strong> (10.03.2020)</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>DOI: </strong>10.5281/zenodo.4394267</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Description</strong></p>
<p>The IPBES Scoping document for the values assessment highlights the need to assess the types of values of nature that have (or have not) been incorporated into decision-making, the types of valuation approaches incorporated into decision-making, the challenges that have hindered the incorporation of diverse conceptualizations of values of nature in a range of decision and policymaking contexts and the implications for different stakeholders. In this context a literature & case-study review was conducted to examine how values are articulated by diverse stakeholders through protected area policies and other conservation schemes including indigenous community conserved areas (ICCAs), and how they come to influence outcomes. Through this review we address the following questions:</p>
<ol>
<li>What types of protected area impacts are most frequently studied, what valuation methods are used to assess these impacts, and where are the gaps in the evidence on the impacts of protected areas?</li>
<li>What enabling conditions related to protected area design and implementation processes are linked to more beneficial social and environmental impacts?</li>
<li>What aspects of the decision process and specifically the inclusion of marginalised values and the values of marginalised people in decision-making are associated with improvements in well-being, sustainability and justice?</li>
</ol>
Zenodo
2022-03-10
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
4394267
user-ipbes
02
1660003321.611294
1849939
md5:b34093064e7303bd51d3c3c5cc620791
https://zenodo.org/records/6516027/files/7_IPBES_VA_4.6_2020_(G).pdf
144358
md5:258594c6d1691a749f87971cf5e60aab
https://zenodo.org/records/6516027/files/5_IPBES_VA_4.6_2020_(E).csv
110724
md5:dbec7ba0f196ae413f57cc3698cab287
https://zenodo.org/records/6516027/files/6_IPBES_VA_4.6_2020_(F).pdf
507888
md5:918c17daa2c2ec9e63b2f4254958631a
https://zenodo.org/records/6516027/files/0_IPBES_VA_4.6_ProtectedAreas.pdf
19583
md5:279bcc864c32dbc90f135fb5a174e90a
https://zenodo.org/records/6516027/files/1_IPBES_VA_4.6_2020_(A).csv
268656
md5:684af7edea5957abe9afadd0804e2356
https://zenodo.org/records/6516027/files/2_IPBES_VA_4.6_2020_(B).csv
497028
md5:5bb88ec26d55c7af0f59c71598455743
https://zenodo.org/records/6516027/files/3_IPBES_VA_4.6_2020_(C).csv
42910
md5:d1661b96705980df163eef15e7898115
https://zenodo.org/records/6516027/files/4_IPBES_VA_4.6_2020_(D).csv
public
10.5281/zenodo.6522261
Documents
doi
10.5281/zenodo.4394267
isVersionOf
doi