10.5281/zenodo.6516027
https://zenodo.org/records/6516027
oai:zenodo.org:6516027
Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer
Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer
0000-0002-1539-5231
Rachel Neugarten
Rachel Neugarten
0000-0003-0647-0516
IPBES VA Chapter 4 - Literature & case study review on outcomes in protected areas and indigenous and community conserved areas (ICCAs)
Zenodo
2022
IPBES
Values Assessment
Chapter 4
Agnes Pawlowska-Mainville
Agnes Pawlowska-Mainville
Fernanda Rios
Fernanda Rios
Elise Delgoulet
Elise Delgoulet
Alice Millington
Alice Millington
Jorge Llopis
Jorge Llopis
Tim Baird
Tim Baird
Sushma Shrestha
Sushma Shrestha
Fred Saunders
Fred Saunders
Gabby Ahmadia
Gabby Ahmadia
Supin Wongbusarakum
Supin Wongbusarakum
Natalie Kurashima
Natalie Kurashima
Kawika B. Winter
Kawika B. Winter
Mehana B. Vaughn
Mehana B. Vaughn
Harold Eyster
Harold Eyster
David González-Jiménez
David González-Jiménez
0000-0003-1835-415X
2022-03-10
eng
10.5281/zenodo.6522261
10.5281/zenodo.4394267
https://zenodo.org/communities/ipbes
02
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
IPBES VA Chapter 4 - Literature & case study review on outcomes in protected areas and indigenous and community conserved areas (ICCAs) / IPBES values assessment (4.6)
Code: IPBES_VA_4.6
Versioning 01: (24.11.2020)
Versioning 02: (10.03.2020)
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4394267
Description
The IPBES Scoping document for the values assessment highlights the need to assess the types of values of nature that have (or have not) been incorporated into decision-making, the types of valuation approaches incorporated into decision-making, the challenges that have hindered the incorporation of diverse conceptualizations of values of nature in a range of decision and policymaking contexts and the implications for different stakeholders. In this context a literature & case-study review was conducted to examine how values are articulated by diverse stakeholders through protected area policies and other conservation schemes including indigenous community conserved areas (ICCAs), and how they come to influence outcomes. Through this review we address the following questions:
What types of protected area impacts are most frequently studied, what valuation methods are used to assess these impacts, and where are the gaps in the evidence on the impacts of protected areas?
What enabling conditions related to protected area design and implementation processes are linked to more beneficial social and environmental impacts?
What aspects of the decision process and specifically the inclusion of marginalised values and the values of marginalised people in decision-making are associated with improvements in well-being, sustainability and justice?