Preprint Open Access
Ricks, Wilson;
Norbeck, Jack;
Jenkins, Jesse
{ "files": [ { "links": { "self": "https://zenodo.org/api/files/8faf00a5-5931-4bb5-bb7e-50b5a6a9956a/Data%20Sample.zip" }, "checksum": "md5:7758edea8e529a98516eae024c9abffd", "bucket": "8faf00a5-5931-4bb5-bb7e-50b5a6a9956a", "key": "Data Sample.zip", "type": "zip", "size": 2118312 }, { "links": { "self": "https://zenodo.org/api/files/8faf00a5-5931-4bb5-bb7e-50b5a6a9956a/Preprint.pdf" }, "checksum": "md5:d2a2b81ba6c79fd9eb0a1691914da596", "bucket": "8faf00a5-5931-4bb5-bb7e-50b5a6a9956a", "key": "Preprint.pdf", "type": "pdf", "size": 1638855 }, { "links": { "self": "https://zenodo.org/api/files/8faf00a5-5931-4bb5-bb7e-50b5a6a9956a/Research_Digest.pdf" }, "checksum": "md5:de61f215eb434a3630d46a8dee54510f", "bucket": "8faf00a5-5931-4bb5-bb7e-50b5a6a9956a", "key": "Research_Digest.pdf", "type": "pdf", "size": 771918 } ], "owners": [ 324596 ], "doi": "10.5281/zenodo.6385742", "stats": { "version_unique_downloads": 675.0, "unique_views": 1063.0, "views": 1177.0, "version_views": 2460.0, "unique_downloads": 248.0, "version_unique_views": 2173.0, "volume": 436409721.0, "version_downloads": 765.0, "downloads": 287.0, "version_volume": 1194641238.0 }, "links": { "doi": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6385742", "conceptdoi": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6377484", "bucket": "https://zenodo.org/api/files/8faf00a5-5931-4bb5-bb7e-50b5a6a9956a", "conceptbadge": "https://zenodo.org/badge/doi/10.5281/zenodo.6377484.svg", "html": "https://zenodo.org/record/6385742", "latest_html": "https://zenodo.org/record/6385742", "badge": "https://zenodo.org/badge/doi/10.5281/zenodo.6385742.svg", "latest": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/6385742" }, "conceptdoi": "10.5281/zenodo.6377484", "created": "2022-03-26T00:24:30.116148+00:00", "updated": "2022-03-26T01:49:23.250195+00:00", "conceptrecid": "6377484", "revision": 2, "id": 6385742, "metadata": { "access_right_category": "success", "doi": "10.5281/zenodo.6385742", "description": "<p>Geothermal systems making use of advanced drilling and well stimulation techniques have the potential to<br>\nprovide tens to hundreds of gigawatts of clean electricity generation in the United States by 2050. With<br>\nnear-zero variable costs, geothermal plants have traditionally been envisioned as providing ‘‘baseload’’ power,<br>\ngenerating at their maximum rated output at all times. However, as variable renewable energy sources (VREs)<br>\nsee greater deployment in energy markets, baseload power is becoming increasingly less competitive relative to<br>\nflexible, dispatchable generation and energy storage. Herein we conduct an analysis of the potential for future<br>\ngeothermal plants to provide both of these services, taking advantage of the natural properties of confined,<br>\nengineered geothermal reservoirs to store energy in the form of accumulated, pressurized geofluid and provide<br>\nflexible load-following generation. We develop a linear optimization model based on multi-physics reservoir<br>\nsimulations that captures the transient pressure and flow behaviors within a confined, engineered geothermal<br>\nreservoir. We then optimize the investment decisions and hourly operations of a power plant exploiting such<br>\na reservoir against a set of historical and modeled future electricity price series. We find that operational<br>\nflexibility and in-reservoir energy storage can significantly enhance the value of geothermal plants in markets<br>\nwith high VRE penetration, with energy value improvements of up to 60% relative to conventional baseload<br>\nplants operating under identical conditions. Across a range of realistic subsurface and operational conditions,<br>\nour modeling demonstrates that confined, engineered geothermal reservoirs can provide large and effectively<br>\nfree energy storage capacity, with round-trip storage efficiencies comparable to those of leading grid-scale<br>\nenergy storage technologies. Optimized operational strategies indicate that flexible geothermal plants can<br>\nprovide both short- and long-duration energy storage, prioritizing output during periods of high electricity<br>\nprices. Sensitivity analysis assesses the variation in outcomes across a range of subsurface conditions and cost<br>\nscenarios.</p>\n\n<p>Reference for published paper: Ricks, W., Norbeck, J., and Jenkins, J.D., "The value of in-reservoir energy storage for flexible dispatch of geothermal power,"<em> Applied Energy</em>, Volume 313, 2022, 118807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118807</p>", "license": { "id": "CC-BY-4.0" }, "title": "The Value of In-Reservoir Energy Storage for Flexible Dispatch of Geothermal Power", "relations": { "version": [ { "count": 2, "index": 1, "parent": { "pid_type": "recid", "pid_value": "6377484" }, "is_last": true, "last_child": { "pid_type": "recid", "pid_value": "6385742" } } ] }, "communities": [ { "id": "zero-lab" } ], "keywords": [ "Geothermal, Enhanced, Flexible, Storage, EGS" ], "publication_date": "2022-03-22", "creators": [ { "orcid": "0000-0003-3385-1605", "affiliation": "Princeton University", "name": "Ricks, Wilson" }, { "affiliation": "Fervo Energy", "name": "Norbeck, Jack" }, { "orcid": "0000-0002-9670-7793", "affiliation": "Princeton University", "name": "Jenkins, Jesse" } ], "access_right": "open", "resource_type": { "subtype": "preprint", "type": "publication", "title": "Preprint" }, "related_identifiers": [ { "scheme": "doi", "identifier": "10.5281/zenodo.6377484", "relation": "isVersionOf" } ] } }
All versions | This version | |
---|---|---|
Views | 2,460 | 1,177 |
Downloads | 765 | 287 |
Data volume | 1.2 GB | 436.4 MB |
Unique views | 2,173 | 1,063 |
Unique downloads | 675 | 248 |