Other Open Access

Precarity in academia is tied to the contestable funding model.

Lee, K.L.

Dublin Core Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Lee, K.L.</dc:creator>
  <dc:description>This brief explores some of the drivers of precarity that are inherently built-in to our current contestable research funding model; although not by design.  Herein, it is also highlighted why funding research and indeed researchers, 100% from contestable sources, does not reflect the reality of what academic researchers do with their time.  In reality, researchers need to use a % of their time to do research-related (research-support) tasks, career-building tasks as well as research community contributions that are not explicitly described within the research projects that actually supply 100% of their salary.   The system also fails to recognise that research is a continuum of knowledge-building rather than a series of individual research projects.  With no element of stable funding base in the current system, the ability of researchers to carry out knowledge-building is compromised and there is therefore knowledge-loss.  Precarity of our research workforce also drives skill-loss and is subsequently wasting money and resources.  The proposal of a base grant model goes some way to recognise the reality of how research is actually carried out and therefore support a more efficient, flexible system, putting people and their talent first. </dc:description>
  <dc:subject>Research funding</dc:subject>
  <dc:title>Precarity in academia is tied to the contestable funding model.</dc:title>
All versions This version
Views 7070
Downloads 1919
Data volume 5.6 MB5.6 MB
Unique views 5959
Unique downloads 1919


Cite as