March 14, 2022 Project deliverable Open Access

Cole, Nicki Lisa; Reichmann, Stefan; Ross-Hellauer, Tony

MARC21 XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <leader>00000nam##2200000uu#4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">recommendations</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">equity</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">open science</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">responsible research and innovation</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20220316080329.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="001">6276753</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-1544-5064</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Reichmann, Stefan</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-4470-7027</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Ross-Hellauer, Tony</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">19397987</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">md5:8430dadb6b3d196d8e2ecb8c51514fc3</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">https://zenodo.org/record/6276753/files/On Merrit-recommenations.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">open</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2022-03-14</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="p">openaire</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">user-on-merrit</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">oai:zenodo.org:6276753</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-6034-533X</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Cole, Nicki Lisa</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Global Thinking. ON-MERRIT recommendations for maximising equity in open and responsible research</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">user-on-merrit</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="536" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">824612</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Observing and Negating Matthew Effects in Responsible Research and Innovation Transition</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">opendefinition.org</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">&lt;p&gt;Open and responsible research has the potential to profoundly alter the who, what,&amp;nbsp;why, when and how of knowledge-creation. Yet it is not a destiny. The ways we&amp;nbsp;implement change today will have long-lasting consequences for the kind of open&amp;nbsp;and responsible research ecosystem we inhabit tomorrow. For that future to be one&amp;nbsp;more equitable than today&amp;rsquo;s world, critical consideration must be given to the ways in&amp;nbsp;which agendas of openness are shaped by those in positions of power and privilege,&amp;nbsp;and might hence reflect or even reinforce global dynamics of inequity.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;ON-MERRIT is an EC-funded project to investigate dynamics of cumulative&amp;nbsp;advantage and threats to equity in the transition to Open Research and Responsible&amp;nbsp;Research &amp;amp; Innovation (RRI) across a range of stakeholder categories (in particular&amp;nbsp;for those at the periphery) and multiple dimensions of Open Research, as well as its&amp;nbsp;interfaces with industry and policy. Our results found many areas of concern, from&amp;nbsp;which we identified four key areas of risk:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Resource-intensity of Open Research: Putting open and responsible research into&amp;nbsp;practice requires considerable resources (including infrastructures, services, and&amp;nbsp;training). The structural inequalities that exist within institutions, regions and nations,&amp;nbsp;and on a global scale, create structural advantages for well-resourced actors and&amp;nbsp;structural disadvantages for less-resourced actors, in terms of capacity and ability to&amp;nbsp;engage in these practices.&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Article-processing charges and the stratification of Open Access publishing: The&amp;nbsp;article processing charge (APC)&amp;nbsp; model within Open Access publishing seems to&amp;nbsp;discriminate against those with limited resources (especially those from less-resourced&amp;nbsp;regions and institutions). These facts seem to be having effects of&amp;nbsp;stratification in terms of who publishes where.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Societal inclusion in research and policy-making: Open and responsible research&amp;nbsp;processes take place within broader social systems where inequalities continue to&amp;nbsp;structure access and privilege certain actors while others are&amp;nbsp;disadvantaged. Despite&amp;nbsp;laudable aims of equity, inclusion and diversity in open and responsible research, the&amp;nbsp;most marginalised, vulnerable, and poor remain mostly excluded.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Reform of reward and recognition: Institutional processes for reward and recognition&amp;nbsp;not only do not&amp;nbsp;sufficiently&amp;nbsp;support the uptake of open and responsible research, but&amp;nbsp;often get in the way of them. This disadvantages those who wish to take up these&amp;nbsp;practices (putting early-career researchers especially at risk).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="n">doi</subfield>
    <subfield code="i">isVersionOf</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.6276752</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.6276753</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">publication</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">deliverable</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>