Project deliverable Open Access
Cole, Nicki Lisa;
Reichmann, Stefan;
Ross-Hellauer, Tony
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd"> <identifier identifierType="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.6276753</identifier> <creators> <creator> <creatorName>Cole, Nicki Lisa</creatorName> <givenName>Nicki Lisa</givenName> <familyName>Cole</familyName> <nameIdentifier nameIdentifierScheme="ORCID" schemeURI="http://orcid.org/">0000-0002-6034-533X</nameIdentifier> </creator> <creator> <creatorName>Reichmann, Stefan</creatorName> <givenName>Stefan</givenName> <familyName>Reichmann</familyName> <nameIdentifier nameIdentifierScheme="ORCID" schemeURI="http://orcid.org/">0000-0003-1544-5064</nameIdentifier> </creator> <creator> <creatorName>Ross-Hellauer, Tony</creatorName> <givenName>Tony</givenName> <familyName>Ross-Hellauer</familyName> <nameIdentifier nameIdentifierScheme="ORCID" schemeURI="http://orcid.org/">0000-0003-4470-7027</nameIdentifier> </creator> </creators> <titles> <title>Global Thinking. ON-MERRIT recommendations for maximising equity in open and responsible research</title> </titles> <publisher>Zenodo</publisher> <publicationYear>2022</publicationYear> <subjects> <subject>recommendations</subject> <subject>equity</subject> <subject>open science</subject> <subject>responsible research and innovation</subject> </subjects> <dates> <date dateType="Issued">2022-03-14</date> </dates> <language>en</language> <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">Project deliverable</resourceType> <alternateIdentifiers> <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://zenodo.org/record/6276753</alternateIdentifier> </alternateIdentifiers> <relatedIdentifiers> <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsVersionOf">10.5281/zenodo.6276752</relatedIdentifier> <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsPartOf">https://zenodo.org/communities/on-merrit</relatedIdentifier> </relatedIdentifiers> <version>1.0</version> <rightsList> <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</rights> <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights> </rightsList> <descriptions> <description descriptionType="Abstract"><p>Open and responsible research has the potential to profoundly alter the who, what,&nbsp;why, when and how of knowledge-creation. Yet it is not a destiny. The ways we&nbsp;implement change today will have long-lasting consequences for the kind of open&nbsp;and responsible research ecosystem we inhabit tomorrow. For that future to be one&nbsp;more equitable than today&rsquo;s world, critical consideration must be given to the ways in&nbsp;which agendas of openness are shaped by those in positions of power and privilege,&nbsp;and might hence reflect or even reinforce global dynamics of inequity.&nbsp;</p> <p>ON-MERRIT is an EC-funded project to investigate dynamics of cumulative&nbsp;advantage and threats to equity in the transition to Open Research and Responsible&nbsp;Research &amp; Innovation (RRI) across a range of stakeholder categories (in particular&nbsp;for those at the periphery) and multiple dimensions of Open Research, as well as its&nbsp;interfaces with industry and policy. Our results found many areas of concern, from&nbsp;which we identified four key areas of risk:</p> <ul> <li>Resource-intensity of Open Research: Putting open and responsible research into&nbsp;practice requires considerable resources (including infrastructures, services, and&nbsp;training). The structural inequalities that exist within institutions, regions and nations,&nbsp;and on a global scale, create structural advantages for well-resourced actors and&nbsp;structural disadvantages for less-resourced actors, in terms of capacity and ability to&nbsp;engage in these practices.</li> <li>Article-processing charges and the stratification of Open Access publishing: The&nbsp;article processing charge (APC)&nbsp; model within Open Access publishing seems to&nbsp;discriminate against those with limited resources (especially those from less-resourced&nbsp;regions and institutions). These facts seem to be having effects of&nbsp;stratification in terms of who publishes where.&nbsp;</li> <li>Societal inclusion in research and policy-making: Open and responsible research&nbsp;processes take place within broader social systems where inequalities continue to&nbsp;structure access and privilege certain actors while others are&nbsp;disadvantaged. Despite&nbsp;laudable aims of equity, inclusion and diversity in open and responsible research, the&nbsp;most marginalised, vulnerable, and poor remain mostly excluded.&nbsp;</li> <li>Reform of reward and recognition: Institutional processes for reward and recognition&nbsp;not only do not&nbsp;sufficiently&nbsp;support the uptake of open and responsible research, but&nbsp;often get in the way of them. This disadvantages those who wish to take up these&nbsp;practices (putting early-career researchers especially at risk).</li> </ul></description> </descriptions> <fundingReferences> <fundingReference> <funderName>European Commission</funderName> <funderIdentifier funderIdentifierType="Crossref Funder ID">10.13039/100010661</funderIdentifier> <awardNumber awardURI="info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/824612/">824612</awardNumber> <awardTitle>Observing and Negating Matthew Effects in Responsible Research and Innovation Transition</awardTitle> </fundingReference> </fundingReferences> </resource>
All versions | This version | |
---|---|---|
Views | 6,024 | 6,024 |
Downloads | 3,946 | 3,946 |
Data volume | 76.5 GB | 76.5 GB |
Unique views | 5,469 | 5,469 |
Unique downloads | 3,455 | 3,455 |