Journal article Open Access

Blockchain for science and knowledge creation

Bartling, Sönke; Fecher, Benedikt


MARC21 XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <leader>00000nam##2200000uu#4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">1. 	Swan M. Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy [Internet]. O’Reilly Media; 2015. Available: https://books.google.de/books?id=RHJmBgAAQBAJ</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">2. 	The trust machine. In: The Economist [Internet]. 2015 [cited 22 Jun 2016]. Available: http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21677198-technology-behind-bitcoin-could-transform-how-economy-works-trust-machine</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">3. 	Meta-Council on Emerging Technologies. In: World Economic Forum [Internet]. [cited 6 Jul 2016]. Available: https://www.weforum.org/communities/meta-council-on-emerging-technologies/</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">4. 	Ulieru M. Blockchain Enhances Privacy, Security and Conveyance of Data. Scientific American. Available: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/blockchain-enhances-privacy-security-and-conveyance-of-data/. Accessed 6 Jul 2016.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">5. 	Ioannidis JPA, Greenland S, Hlatky MA, Khoury MJ, Macleod MR, Moher D, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet. 2014;383: 166–175. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62227-8</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">6. 	Ioannidis JPA. How to make more published research true. PLoS Med. 2014;11: e1001747. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001747</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">7. 	Ioannidis JPA. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. PLoS Med. 2005;2: e124. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">8. 	Young NS, Ioannidis JPA, Al-Ubaydli O. Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science. PLoS Med. Oktober 7, 2008;5: e201. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050201</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">9. 	Goldacre B. Are clinical trial data shared sufficiently today? No. BMJ. 2013;347: f1880. doi:10.1136/bmj.f1880</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">10. 	Engber D. Think Psychology’s Replication Crisis Is Bad? Welcome to the One in Medicine. In: Slate Magazine [Internet]. 19 Apr 2016 [cited 25 Jun 2016]. Available: http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/future_tense/2016/04/biomedicine_facing_a_worse_replication_crisis_than_the_one_plaguing_psychology.html</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">11. 	Freedman LP, Cockburn IM, Simcoe TS. The Economics of Reproducibility in Preclinical Research. PLoS Biol. 2015;13: e1002165. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002165</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">12. 	Angell M. Drug companies &amp; doctors: A story of corruption. New York Rev Books. 2009;56: 8–12. Available: http://www.fondazionedibella.org/cms-web/upl/doc/Documenti-inseriti-dal-2-11-2007/Truth%20About%20The%20Drug%20Companies.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">13. 	Schneider L. Voinnet aftermath: ethical bankruptcy of academic elites. In: For Better Science [Internet]. 7 Apr 2016 [cited 7 Jul 2016]. Available: https://forbetterscience.wordpress.com/2016/04/07/voinnet-aftermath-ethical-bankruptcy-of-academic-elites/</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">14. 	pubpeer. A crisis of trust | PubPeer [Internet]. [cited 7 Jul 2016]. Available: http://blog.pubpeer.com/?p=164&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=a-crisis-of-trust</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">15. 	Haber S, Stuart H, W.Scott S. How to time-stamp a digital document. J Cryptology. 1991;3. doi:10.1007/bf00196791</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">16. 	Nakamoto S. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system [Internet]. 2008. Available: http://www.cryptovest.co.uk/resources/Bitcoin%20paper%20Original.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">17. 	Tschorsch F, Scheuermann B. Bitcoin and beyond: A technical survey on decentralized digital currencies. ieeexplore.ieee.org; 2015; Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=7423672</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">18. 	Lamport L, Shostak R, Pease M. The Byzantine Generals Problem. ACM Trans Program Lang Syst. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 1982;4: 382–401. doi:10.1145/357172.357176</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">19. 	Lamport L. The Part-time Parliament. ACM Trans Comput Syst. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 1998;16: 133–169. doi:10.1145/279227.279229</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">20. 	Jakobsson M, Juels A. Proofs of work and bread pudding protocols. Secure Information Networks. Springer; 1999. pp. 258–272. Available: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-0-387-35568-9_18</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">21. 	Buterin V. On Public and Private Blockchains. Ethereum Blog. 2015;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">22. 	Science B.0 on Twitter. In: Twitter [Internet]. [cited 22 Jun 2016]. Available: https://twitter.com/science_b0/status/712126802064449536</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">23. 	Wisniewska A. Altcoins [Internet]. Institute of Economic Research; 2016 May. Report No.: 14/2016. Available: http://ideas.repec.org/p/pes/wpaper/2016no14.html</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">24. 	Hurlburt G. Might the Blockchain Outlive Bitcoin? IT Prof. 2016;18: 12–16. doi:10.1109/MITP.2016.21</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">25. 	Buterin V. Ethereum: A Next-Generation Smart Contract and Decentralized Application Platform. 2013a. URL $\{$http://ethereum org/ethereum html$\}$.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">26. 	Nick Szabo -- The Idea of Smart Contracts [Internet]. [cited 22 Jun 2016]. Available: http://szabo.best.vwh.net/smart_contracts_idea.html</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">27. 	DAOs, DACs, DAs and More: An Incomplete Terminology Guide - Ethereum Blog. In: Ethereum Blog [Internet]. 6 May 2014 [cited 22 Jun 2016]. Available: https://blog.ethereum.org/2014/05/06/daos-dacs-das-and-more-an-incomplete-terminology-guide/</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">28. 	(6) T, (7) J, (4) P. A Proposal For An Incentivized Synthetic Biology System Subchain On The Steem Blockchain Platform — Steemit. In: Steemit [Internet]. [cited 6 Aug 2016]. Available: https://steemit.com/science/@transhuman/a-proposal-for-an-incentivized-synthetic-biology-system-subchain-on-the-steem-blockchain-platform</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">29. 	Plagiarism concerns raised over popular blockchain paper on catching misconduct - Retraction Watch. In: Retraction Watch [Internet]. 14 Jul 2016 [cited 15 Jul 2016]. Available: http://retractionwatch.com/2016/07/14/plagiarism-concerns-raised-over-popular-blockchain-paper-on-catching-misconduct/</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">30. 	Bradley J, Bradley J. Scientific Research Needs a Trustless Blockchain Architecture to Be Trusted - CCN: Financial Bitcoin &amp; Cryptocurrency News. In: CCN: Financial Bitcoin &amp; Cryptocurrency News [Internet]. 13 May 2016 [cited 2 Jul 2016]. Available: https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/scientific-research-needs-a-trustless-blockchain-architecture-to-be-trusted/</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">31. 	Redman J. Clinical Trials Show the Blockchain Can Stop “Fraudulent” Science. In: Bitcoin News [Internet]. 19 May 2016 [cited 2 Jul 2016]. Available: https://news.bitcoin.com/clinical-blockchain-stop-fraud-science/</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">32. 	Astroblocks Puts Proofs of Scientific Discoveries on the Bitcoin Blockchain [Internet]. [cited 22 Jun 2016]. Available: http://insidebitcoins.com/news/astroblocks-puts-proofs-of-scientific-discoveries-on-the-bitcoin-blockchain/31153</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">33. 	Cawrey D, Wolinsky J, Rampton J, Wolinsky R, Palmer D. Bitcoin’s Technology Could Revolutionize Intellectual Property Rights. In: CoinDesk [Internet]. 8 May 2014 [cited 22 Jun 2016]. Available: http://www.coindesk.com/how-block-chain-technology-is-working-to-transform-intellectual-property/</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">34. 	Irving G, Holden J. How blockchain-timestamped protocols could improve the trustworthiness of medical science. F1000Res. 2016;5: 222. doi:10.12688/f1000research.8114.1</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">35. 	Carlisle BG. The Grey Literature, apparently — Proof of prespecified endpoints in medical research with the bitcoin blockchain [Internet]. [cited 15 Jul 2016]. Available: http://www.bgcarlisle.com/blog/2014/08/25/proof-of-prespecified-endpoints-in-medical-research-with-the-bitcoin-blockchain/</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">36. 	Blockchains For Science: Aligning Research Incentives. In: Doing Distributed Business [Internet]. [cited 22 Jun 2016]. Available: https://db.erisindustries.com/science/2016/03/14/blockchains-and-science/</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">37. 	Ioannidis JPA. Why Most Clinical Research Is Not Useful. PLoS Med. 2016;13: e1002049. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002049</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">38. 	Schneider L. False priorities at EU2016NL: Mandate Open Data instead of Gold Open Access! In: For Better Science [Internet]. 28 Apr 2016 [cited 2 Jul 2016]. Available: https://forbetterscience.wordpress.com/2016/04/28/false-priorities-at-eu2016nl-mandate-open-data-instead-of-gold-open-access/</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">39. 	soenkeba on Twitter. In: Twitter [Internet]. [cited 2 Jul 2016]. Available: https://twitter.com/soenkeba/status/697436268737777664</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">40. 	Topol EJ. Money back guarantees for non-reproducible results? BMJ. 2016;353: i2770. doi:10.1136/bmj.i2770</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">41. 	Wagner A. Putting the Blockchain to Work For Science! In: Bitcoin Magazine [Internet]. 22 May 2014 [cited 2 Jul 2016]. Available: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/putting-the-blockchain-to-work-for-science-gridcoin-1400747268</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">42. 	Scott M. The Future of Medical Records: Two Blockchain Experts Weigh In [Internet]. [cited 2 Jul 2016]. Available: https://btcmanager.com/news/the-future-of-medical-records-two-blockchain-experts-weigh-in/</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">43. 	Magazine B. Bitcoin Magazine | Bitcoin and Blockchain News [Internet]. [cited 22 Jun 2016]. Available: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/from-bench-to-bedside-enabling-reproducible-commercial-science-via-blockchain-1464881141)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">44. 	Dynamic Publication Formats and Collaborative Authoring - Springer [Internet]. [cited 22 Jun 2016]. Available: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_13</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">45. 	benjojo, pharesim. Independent scientists could blog their research onto the Steemit blockchain — Steemit. In: Steemit [Internet]. [cited 1 Aug 2016]. Available: https://steemit.com/research/@benjojo/independent-sientists-could-blog-their-research-onto-the-steemit-blockchain</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">46. 	Science B.0 on Twitter. In: Twitter [Internet]. [cited 2 Jul 2016]. Available: https://twitter.com/science_b0/status/695886036447203328</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">47. 	b8d5ad9d974a44e7e2882f986467f4d. Towards Open Science: The Case for a Decentralized Autonomous Academic Endorsement System [Internet]. Zenodo; 2016. doi:10.5281/zenodo.60054</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">48. 	Lab MM. Certificates, Reputation, and the Blockchain — MIT MEDIA LAB. In: Medium [Internet]. 27 Oct 2015 [cited 22 Jun 2016]. Available: https://medium.com/mit-media-lab/certificates-reputation-and-the-blockchain-aee03622426f</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">49. 	The Possibilities of Badges and Blockchain - DML Central. In: DML Central [Internet]. 11 Feb 2016 [cited 22 Jun 2016]. Available: http://dmlcentral.net/the-possibilities-of-badges-and-blockchain/</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">50. 	Lambert Heller on Twitter. In: Twitter [Internet]. [cited 6 Jul 2016]. Available: https://twitter.com/Lambo/status/192725705556103169</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">51. 	Wolfers J, Zitzewitz E. Prediction Markets [Internet]. National Bureau of Economic Research; 2004. doi:10.3386/w10504</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">52. 	Dreber A, Pfeiffer T, Almenberg J, Isaksson S, Wilson B, Chen Y, et al. Using prediction markets to estimate the reproducibility of scientific research. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112: 15343–15347. doi:10.1073/pnas.1516179112</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">53. 	Hanson R. Could gambling save science? Encouraging an honest consensus. Social Epistemology. 1995;9: 3–33. doi:10.1080/02691729508578768</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">54. 	Almenberg J, Kittlitz K, Pfeiffer T. An experiment on prediction markets in science. PLoS One. 2009;4: e8500. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008500</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">55. 	Park I-U, Peacey MW, Munafò MR. Modelling the effects of subjective and objective decision making in scientific peer review. Nature. 2014;506: 93–96. doi:10.1038/nature12786</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">56. 	Bollen J, Crandall D, Junk D, Ding Y, Börner K. From funding agencies to scientific agency: Collective allocation of science funding as an alternative to peer review. EMBO Rep. 2014;15: 131–133. doi:10.1002/embr.201338068</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">57. 	Science B.0 on Twitter. In: Twitter [Internet]. [cited 22 Jun 2016]. Available: https://twitter.com/science_b0/status/710412421987508225</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">58. 	Popper N. A Venture Fund With Plenty of Virtual Capital, but No Capitalist. The New York Times. 21 May 2016. Available: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/22/business/dealbook/crypto-ether-bitcoin-currency.html. Accessed 22 Jun 2016.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">59. 	ScientistFive. Agora: A proposal to overcome the limitations of the current knowledge creation process [Internet]. Zenodo; 2015. doi:10.5281/zenodo.14969</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Blockchain for Science</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20200120170918.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="001">60223</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">German Institute for Economic Research and Alexander von Humboldt Institute for internet and society</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Fecher, Benedikt</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">335291</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">md5:59e13bfd62ef512fff8b9f3f9f813426</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">https://zenodo.org/record/60223/files/ZenodoBlockchainforScienceKnowledgeCreation.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">open</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2016-08-14</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="p">openaire</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">oai:zenodo.org:60223</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Associate researcher at the Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Bartling, Sönke</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Blockchain for science and knowledge creation</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">opendefinition.org</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Blockchain&lt;/em&gt; technology has the capacity to make digital goods immutable, transparent, externally provable, decentralized, and distributed. Besides the initial experiment or data acquisition, all remaining parts of the research cycle could take place within a &lt;em&gt;blockchain system&lt;/em&gt;. Attribution, data, data postprocessing, publication, research evaluation, incentivisation, and research fund distribution would thereby become comprehensible, open (at will) and provable to the external world. Currently, scientists must be trusted to provide a true and useful representation of their research results in their final publication; &lt;em&gt;blockchain&lt;/em&gt; would make much larger parts of the research cycle open to scientific self-correction. This bears the potential to be a technical solution to the current reproducibility crisis in science, and could &amp;lsquo;reduce waste and make more research results true&amp;rsquo;.&lt;/p&gt;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.60223</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">publication</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">article</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
1,966
838
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 1,9661,968
Downloads 838838
Data volume 281.0 MB281.0 MB
Unique views 1,8741,876
Unique downloads 793793

Share

Cite as