Published July 24, 2016 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Where do beliefs about Music Piracy come from and how are they shared? An Ethnographic Study

  • 1. The University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Contributors

  • 1. Raksha Shakti University

Description

Research suggests that those individuals engaging in music piracy have little concern for the potentially negative consequences of engaging in this illegal activity. This study aims to build on previous research which finds that sub-cultural piracy knowledge is effectively transmitted online. Explicitly, this study aims to observe the various justifications people forward to rationalise engagement in music piracy, in accordance with Sykes and Matza’s (1957) widely researched neutralization theory, and if techniques used to rationalize behaviours are shared amongst those individuals found to be discussing and engaging in music piracy online. The research examines naturally occurring discourse across three online settings, finding a widespread perception that there is ‘no harm done’ and that tips to work around web-blocking are exchanged online, including in public spaces such as Twitter. However, differences were found in the beliefs and attitudes of the sample. The study raises key conceptual issues about the theory used.

Files

Brownvol10issue1IJCC2016.pdf

Files (272.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:6f0dbea99c03638ff1f340881683f8c4
272.9 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Al-Rafee, S. & Dashti, A. E. (2012). A Cross Cultural Comparison of the Extended TPB: The Case of Digital Piracy. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 15(1), 5–24.
  • Altschuller, S., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2009). Is music downloading the new prohibition? What students reveal through an ethical dilemma. Ethics and Information Technology, 11(1), 49–56.
  • Andersen, B., & Frenz, M. (2007). The Impact of Music Downloads and P2P File-Sharing on the Purchase of Music: A Study for Industry Canada. Retrieved from https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/ippd-dppi.nsf/vwapj/IndustryCanadaPaperMay4_2007_en.pdf/$FILE/IndustryCanada PaperMay4_2007_en.pdf.
  • Ang, S. H., Cheng, P. S., Lim, E. A., & Tambyah, S. K. (2001). Spot the difference: Consumer responses towards counterfeits. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(3), 219–235.
  • Ariely, D. (2011). The Upside of Irrationality. London, England: HarperCollins.
  • Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of Moral Behaviour and Development: Vol. 1. Theory (pp. 45–103). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Barker, G. (2012). Evidence of the Effect of Free Music Downloads on the Purchase of Music CDs in Canada. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 9(2), 55–78.
  • Batson, D. C., Thompson, E. R., & Chen, H. (2002). Moral Hypocrisy: Addressing Some Alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 330–339.
  • Bennett, L. (2012). Patterns of listening through social media: online fan engagement with the live music experience. Social Semiotics, 22(5), 545–557.
  • Bonner, S., & O'Higgins, E. (2010). Music piracy: ethical perspectives. Management Decision, 48(9), 1341–1354.
  • Bouhnik, D., & Deshen, M. (2013). Adolescents' Perception of Illegal Music Downloads from the Internet: An Empirical Investigation of Israeli High School Students' Moral Attitude and Behaviour. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 50(1), 1–11.
  • Brennan, M. (2015). Live Music History. In A. Bennett & Waksman, S. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Popular Music (pp. 207–222). London, England: Sage.
  • Brown, I., & Marsden, C. T. (2013). Regulating Code: Good Governance and Better Regulation in the Information Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Brown, S. C. (2010). Attitudes towards digital piracy: The role of morality (Master’s thesis submitted to the University of Edinburgh).
  • Brown, S. C., & Knox, D. (2016a). Why go to pop concerts? The motivations behind live music attendance. Musicae Scientiae. Advance online publication, May 20, 2016. doi: 10.1177/102986491665071.
  • Brown, S. C., & Knox, D. (2016b). Why buy an album? The motivations behind recorded music purchases. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, 26(1), 79–86.
  • Brown, S. E., Esbensen, F. A., & Geis, G. (2007). Criminology: Explaining Crime and Its Context (6th edition). Newark, NJ: Lexis Nexis.
  • Chen, X., Sei-Ching, J. S., Theng, Y.-L., & Lee, C. S. (2015). Why Students Share Misinformation on Social Media: Motivation, Gender, and Study-level Differences. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(5), 583–592.
  • Cho, H., Chung, S., & Filippova, A. (2015). Perceptions of social norms surrounding digital piracy: The effect of social projection and communication exposure on injunctive and descriptive social norms. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 506–515.
  • Connolly, M., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Rockonomics: The Economics of Popular Music. In V. A. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (Eds.), Handbook on the Economics of Art and Culture Volume 1 (pp. 667–719). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
  • Cox, J., & Collins, A. (2014). Sailing in the same ship? Differences in factors motivating piracy of music and movie content. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 50, 70–76.
  • Creswell, J.C. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (2nd edition). London, England: Sage.
  • de Kaminski, M., Svensson, M., Larsson, S., Alkan, S., Olsson, J. A., & Rönkkö, K. (2013). Studying Norms and Social Change in a Digital Age: Identifying and Understanding a Multidimensional Gap Problem. In M. Baier (Ed.), Social and Legal Norms: Towards a Socio-Legal Understanding of Normativity (pp. 309–330). Surrey, England: Ashgate.
  • Doughty, M., Lawson, S., Linehan, C., Rowland, D., & Bennett, L. (2014, June). Disinhibited Abuse of Othered Communities by Second-Screening Audiences. Paper presented at the 2014 ACM international conference on Interactive experiences for TV and online video, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England. Retrieved from University of Lincoln website.
  • Flores, A., & James, C. (2012). Morality and ethics behind the screen: Young people’s perspectives on digital life. New Media Society, 15(6), 834–852.
  • Gayer, A., & Shy, O. (2006). Publishers, artists, and copyright enforcement. Information Economics and Policy, 18(4), 374–384.
  • Gray K. (2012). Stealing from the rich to entertain the poor? A survey of literature on the ethics of digital piracy. The Serials Librarian, 63(3–4), 288–95.
  • Green, T., Sinclair, G., & Tinson, J. (2016). Do they Know it’s CSR at all? An Exploration of Socially Responsible Music Consumption. Journal of Business Ethics. Advance online publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2582-8.
  • Gupta, P. B., Gould, S. J., & Pola, B. (2004). "To Pirate or Not to Pirate": A Comparative Study of the Ethical Versus Other Influences on the Consumer's Software Acquisition-Mode Decision. Journal of Business Ethics, 55(3), 255–274.
  • Hammond, R. G. (2012). Profit Leak? Pre-Release File Sharing and the Music Industry (Working Paper). Retrieved from http://www.serci.org/2012/hammond.pdf.
  • Hickey, G., & Kipping, C. (1996). Issues in research. A multi-stage approach to the coding of data from open-ended questions. Nurse Researcher, 4, 81–91.
  • Higgins, G. (2011). Value and Choice: Examining Their Roles in Digital Piracy. In K. Jaishankar (Ed.), Cyber Criminology: Exploring Internet Crimes and Criminal Behavior (pp. 141–154). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group.
  • Higgins, G. E., & Marcum, C. D. (2011). Digital Piracy: An Integrated Theoretical Approach. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
  • Hinduja, S. (2012). General Strain, Self-Control, and Music Piracy. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 6(1), 951–967.
  • Hinduja, S., & Higgins, G. E. (2011). Trends and patterns among music pirates. Deviant Behavior, 32(7), 563–588.
  • Holt, A. (2010). The economy of live music in the digital age. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 13(2), 243–261.
  • Holt, T. J., & Copes, H. (2010). Transferring Subcultural Knowledge On-Line: Practices and Beliefs of Persistent Digital Pirates. Deviant Behavior, 31(7), 625–654.
  • Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
  • Huygen, A., Rutten, P., Huveneers, S., Limonard, S., Poort, J., Leenheer, J., Janssen, K., van Eijk, N., & Helberger, N. (2009). Ups and downs: Economic and cultural effects of files sharing on music, film and games (Working Paper No. 1350451). Retrieved from Social Science Research Network website: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1350451.
  • Ingram, J. R., & Hinduja, S. (2008). Neutralizing Music Piracy: An Empirical Examination. Deviant Behavior, 29(4), 334–366.
  • Karaganis, J., & Renkema, L. (2013). Copy Culture in the US and Germany. USA: The American Assembly.
  • Kay, D. (2012). Online copyright infringement tracker benchmark study Q3 2012. Retrieved from OFCOM website: http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/other/telecoms-research/copyright-infringement-tracker.
  • Kelly, K. (2011). The Waking Dream. In J. Brockman (Ed.), How is the Internet Changing the Way You Think? (pp. 18–23). New York, NY: Harper Collins.
  • Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. London, England: Sage.
  • Levin, A. M., Dato-on, M. C., & Manolis, C. (2007). Deterring illegal downloading: The effects of threat appeals, past behavior, subjective norms, and attributions of harm. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6(2–3), 111–122.
  • Levitin, D. J. (2014). The Organized Mind. New York City, NY: Dutton.
  • Li, X., & Nergardze, N. (2009). Deterrence Effect of Four Legal and Extralegal Factors on Online Copyright Infringement. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 307–327.
  • Liebowitz, S. J. (2007). How Reliable is the Oberholzer-Gee and Strumpf Paper on File-Sharing? (Working Paper No. 1014399). Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1014399.
  • Liebowitz, S. J. (2010). The Oberholzer-Gee and Strumpf File-Sharing Instrument Fails the Laugh Test (Working Paper No. 1598037). Retrieved from http://people.hss.caltech.edu/~mshum/ec106/The-Oberholzer-GeeStrumpf-File-Sharing-Instrument-Fails-the-Laugh-Test.pdf.
  • Liikkanen, L. A., & Salovaara, A. (2015). Music on YouTube: User engagement with traditional, user-appointed and derivative videos. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 108–124.
  • Lindgren, S. (2010). At the Nexus of Destruction and Creation: Pirate and anti-pirate discourse in Swedish online media. In G. Nalbant & T. Kara (Eds.), New Media and Interactivity (pp. 229–236). Istanbul, Turkey: Marmara University.
  • Lindgren, S., & Lundström, R. (2011). Pirate Culture and Hacktivist Mobilization: The cultural and social protocols of #WikiLeaks on Twitter. New Media and Society, 13(6), 999–1018.
  • MacDonald, R., Kreutz, G., & Mitchell, L. (2012). What is Music, Health, and Wellbeing and Why Is It Important? In R. MacDonald, G. Kreutz, and L. Mitchell (Eds.), Music, Health, and Wellbeing (pp. 3–11). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Marshall, L. (2013). The 360 deal and the ‘new’ music industry. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(1), 77–99.
  • McCosker, A. (2014). Trolling as provocation: YouTube’s agonistic publics. Convergence, 20(2), 201–217.
  • Montoro-Pons, J. D., & Cuadrado-Garcia, M. (2008). Legal origin and intellectual property rights: an empirical study in the prerecorded music sector. European Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 153–173.
  • Moore, R., & McMullan, E.C. (2009). Neutralizations and Rationalizations of Digital Piracy: A Qualitative Analysis of University Students. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 3(1), 441–451.
  • Oberholzer-Gee, F., & Strumpf, K. (2010). File Sharing and Copyright. In J. Lerner & S. Stern (Eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy (pp. 19–55). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Oyetemi, S. O., Gabarron, E., & Wynn, R. (2014). Ebola, Twitter, and misinformation: A dangerous combination? The British Medical Journal, 349, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g6178.
  • Persson, M., (Producer), & Klose, S. (Director). (2013). TPB AFK: The Pirate Bay Away From Keyboard [Motion picture]. Sweden: Self-distributed.
  • Ratkiewicz, J., Conover, M., Meiss, M., Gonçalves, B., Patil, S., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2010). Detecting and tracking the spread of astroturf memes in microblog streams. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web (pp. 249–252). Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1011.3768.
  • Rochelandet, F., & Le Guel, F. (2005). P2P music sharing networks: Why the legal fight against copiers may be inefficient. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 2(2), 69–82.
  • Scharf, N. F. (2013). Digital Copyright Law: Exploring the Changing Interface Between Copyright and Regulation in the Digital Environment (Doctoral dissertation).
  • Schwarz, J. A. (2014). Online File Sharing: Innovations in Media Consumption. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Shermer, M. (2011). The Believing Brain. New York, NY: Times Books.
  • Sinclair, G., & Green, T. (2016). Download or stream? Steal or buy? Developing a typology of today’s music consumer. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 15(1), 3–14.
  • Smallridge, J. L., & Roberts, J. R. (2013). Crime Specific Neutralizations: An Empirical Examination of Four Types of Digital Piracy. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 7(2), 125–140.
  • Sutherland, E. H., & Cressey, D. R. (1974). Criminology (9th edition.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.
  • Sykes, G., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: a theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670.
  • Thelwall, M., Sud, P., & Vis, F. (2012). Commenting on YouTube videos: From guatemalan rock to El Big Bang. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 616–629.
  • Thompson, L., Rivara, F. P., & Whitehill, J. (2015). Prevalence of Marijuana-Related Traffic on Twitter, 2012–2013: A Content Analysis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(6), 311–319.
  • Thorley, M. (2011). Music industry aspirants’ attitudes to intellectual property in the digital age (IIPC Publication Series 5). Retrieved from Coventry University website: https://curve.coventry.ac.uk/open/items/89a7589d-141a-bdf2-b482-ce9312017f84/1.
  • Thun, C. (2009). Introducing Hollywood’s Best Customers Vuze User vs. General Internet: Comparative Data (Research Report). Retrieved from Frank N. Magid Associates website: http://www.magid.com/sites/default/files/pdf/vuze.pdf.
  • Trainer, A. (2015). Live from the ether: YouTube and live music video culture. In A. Jones, J. Bennett, & R.J. Bennett (Eds.), The Digital Evolution of Live Music (pp. 71–84). Oxford, England: Chandos Publishing.
  • Wang, X., & McClung, S.R. (2011). Toward a detailed understanding of illegal digital downloading intentions: An extended theory of planned behavior approach. New Media and Society, 13(4), 663–677.
  • Watson, S. J., Zizzo, D. J., & Fleming, P. (2015). Determinants of Unlawful File Sharing: A Scoping Review. PLoS One, 10, e0127921.
  • Wikström, P. (2011). The music industry: Music in the cloud. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
  • Witt, S. (2015). How Music Got Free. London, England: The Bodley Head.
  • Yu, S. (2012). College Students’ Justification for Digital Piracy: A Mixed Methods Study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(4), 364–378.
  • Zentner, A. (2006). Measuring the effect of file sharing on music purchases. Journal of Law and Economics, 49(1), 63–90.