There is a newer version of this record available.

Journal article Open Access

Explaining alienability contrasts in adpossessive constructions: Predictability vs. iconicity

Haspelmath, Martin


DataCite XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd">
  <identifier identifierType="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.583231</identifier>
  <creators>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Haspelmath, Martin</creatorName>
      <givenName>Martin</givenName>
      <familyName>Haspelmath</familyName>
      <affiliation>Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History</affiliation>
    </creator>
  </creators>
  <titles>
    <title>Explaining alienability contrasts in adpossessive constructions: Predictability vs. iconicity</title>
  </titles>
  <publisher>Zenodo</publisher>
  <publicationYear>2017</publicationYear>
  <subjects>
    <subject>possessive construction, inalienable possession, iconicity</subject>
  </subjects>
  <dates>
    <date dateType="Issued">2017-05-25</date>
  </dates>
  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">Journal article</resourceType>
  <alternateIdentifiers>
    <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://zenodo.org/record/583231</alternateIdentifier>
  </alternateIdentifiers>
  <relatedIdentifiers>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsVersionOf">10.5281/zenodo.788663</relatedIdentifier>
  </relatedIdentifiers>
  <rightsList>
    <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</rights>
    <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights>
  </rightsList>
  <descriptions>
    <description descriptionType="Abstract">&lt;p&gt;This paper argues that alienability contrasts in adnominal possessive constructions should not be explained by iconicity of distance, but by predictability due to the higher relative frequency of possessed occurrences of inalienable nouns. While it is true that when there is an alienability split, the alienable construction typically has an additional marker which often separates the possessor from the possessed noun, the broader generalization is that additional marking is found when the possessive relationship is less predictable. This generalization also extends to cases of antipossessive marking and impossessibility. The diachronic mechanisms responsible for the development of alienability contrasts are differential reduction and differential inhibition of a new construction.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  </descriptions>
  <fundingReferences>
    <fundingReference>
      <funderName>European Commission</funderName>
      <funderIdentifier funderIdentifierType="Crossref Funder ID">10.13039/501100000780</funderIdentifier>
      <awardNumber awardURI="info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/670985/">670985</awardNumber>
      <awardTitle>Form-frequency correspondences in grammar</awardTitle>
    </fundingReference>
  </fundingReferences>
</resource>
239
121
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 239114
Downloads 12152
Data volume 155.9 MB19.6 MB
Unique views 226114
Unique downloads 10645

Share

Cite as