Journal article Closed Access

The six competing types of domination in the early 21st century: Towards a new Weberian taxonomy

Szelenyi, Ivan; Mihályi, Péter

MARC21 XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="">
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2021-11-23</subfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20211124111911.0</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="n">doi</subfield>
    <subfield code="i">isVersionOf</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.5721847</subfield>
  <controlfield tag="001">5721848</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="o"></subfield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="c">175-189</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">International Political Anthropology</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">14</subfield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">&lt;p&gt;This paper follows Weber&amp;rsquo;s interpretative sociology in trying to identify the various systems of domination in the 21&lt;sup&gt;st&lt;/sup&gt; century. Our aim is to describe the &amp;ldquo;actually existing&amp;rdquo; systems: liberalism, conservativism, illiberalism, authoritarianism, dictatorship, and despotism. While the lifespan of various systems of domination may vary, there is no one-way progress-regress among these systems, and most actually existing systems are hybrids and have features from one or the other. There is not one which can imply the end &amp;ldquo;of history&amp;rdquo;. History rather moves in a cyclical way back-and forth between various system of domination.&lt;/p&gt;</subfield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Corvinus University, Budapest</subfield>
    <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-8563-6950</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Mihályi, Péter</subfield>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">closed</subfield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">publication</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">article</subfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Yale University</subfield>
    <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-0520-2552</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Szelenyi, Ivan</subfield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">third wave of democratization</subfield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Weber's systems of domination</subfield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">liberalism</subfield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">illiberalism</subfield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">conservativism</subfield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">democracy</subfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.5721848</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The six competing types of domination in the early 21st century: Towards a new Weberian taxonomy</subfield>
All versions This version
Views 132132
Downloads 44
Data volume 1.3 MB1.3 MB
Unique views 108108
Unique downloads 11


Cite as