Journal article Open Access

A Critique of Control and Black Boxes: Lit Mods of Ian Hatcher's "⌰ (Total Runout)"

Seiça, Álvaro


DataCite XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd">
  <identifier identifierType="URL">https://zenodo.org/record/5578611</identifier>
  <creators>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Seiça, Álvaro</creatorName>
      <givenName>Álvaro</givenName>
      <familyName>Seiça</familyName>
      <nameIdentifier nameIdentifierScheme="ORCID" schemeURI="http://orcid.org/">0000-0002-1137-0811</nameIdentifier>
      <affiliation>University of Bergen</affiliation>
    </creator>
  </creators>
  <titles>
    <title>A Critique of Control and Black Boxes: Lit Mods of Ian Hatcher's "⌰ (Total Runout)"</title>
  </titles>
  <publisher>Zenodo</publisher>
  <publicationYear>2020</publicationYear>
  <subjects>
    <subject>Ian Hatcher</subject>
    <subject>"⌰ (Total Runout)"</subject>
    <subject>digital poetry</subject>
    <subject>sound poetry</subject>
    <subject>performance</subject>
    <subject>black box</subject>
    <subject>control society</subject>
    <subject>surveillance</subject>
    <subject>WikiLeaks</subject>
    <subject>lit mod</subject>
    <subject>erasure poetry</subject>
  </subjects>
  <dates>
    <date dateType="Issued">2020-12-01</date>
  </dates>
  <language>en</language>
  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="JournalArticle"/>
  <alternateIdentifiers>
    <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://zenodo.org/record/5578611</alternateIdentifier>
  </alternateIdentifiers>
  <relatedIdentifiers>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsIdenticalTo">10.1215/03335372-8720043</relatedIdentifier>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsPartOf">https://zenodo.org/communities/artdel</relatedIdentifier>
  </relatedIdentifiers>
  <rightsList>
    <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</rights>
    <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights>
  </rightsList>
  <descriptions>
    <description descriptionType="Abstract">&lt;p&gt;This article analyzes Ian Hatcher&amp;rsquo;s online and kinetic poem &amp;ldquo;⌰ (Total Runout)&amp;rdquo;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;(2015) from a point of view of a critique of corporate and governmental black boxing, at the level of its code, text, visual output, sound, and live performance. The multimodal poem is part of the &lt;em&gt;Drone Pilot&lt;/em&gt; suite, and it is presented in different versions: as a web-based work, sound piece, and performance. It remixes appropriated text from a WikiLeaked manual by the UK Ministry of Defence, essays on artificial intelligence, and Hatcher&amp;rsquo;s own text. The overall versions of the work, understood as variable events, boldly problematize communication and cognitive processes in networks&amp;mdash;whether they are implemented in computer systems by secret agencies or corporations. Hatcher&amp;rsquo;s critique of black boxes entails recreating issues of security, control and surveillance, as digital systems are increasingly paving the way for less privacy and less knowledge about their inner workings. As a result, the poem questions the essence of privacy, redaction, and systemic violence, when access is a privileged asset of agents with security clearances or those with a deep knowledge of programming. This article presents &amp;ldquo;⌰ (Total Runout)&amp;rdquo; in the scope of the poet&amp;rsquo;s aesthetic program. Then, it analyzes its Web version&amp;rsquo;s interface and source code. The kinetic poem&amp;rsquo;s spatial and temporal dimensions are discussed via experiments that modify the source code. The methods here presented deform the poem&amp;rsquo;s temporal display, by means of modifications, or what I call &lt;em&gt;lit mods&lt;/em&gt;. Thus, the article proposes an approach for a more informed reading and understanding of digital kinetic poems, since they are ever-changing events. Finally, it locates the work&amp;rsquo;s aural and performative versions in cultural and political context.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  </descriptions>
  <fundingReferences>
    <fundingReference>
      <funderName>European Commission</funderName>
      <funderIdentifier funderIdentifierType="Crossref Funder ID">10.13039/501100000780</funderIdentifier>
      <awardNumber awardURI="info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/793147/">793147</awardNumber>
      <awardTitle>The Art of Deleting: A Study of Erasure Poetry, Practices of Control, Surveillance, and Censorship</awardTitle>
    </fundingReference>
  </fundingReferences>
</resource>
23
21
views
downloads
Views 23
Downloads 21
Data volume 116.1 MB
Unique views 20
Unique downloads 20

Share

Cite as