Conference paper Open Access

Formal Worst-Case Timing Analysis of Ethernet TSN's Burst-Limiting Shaper

Thiele, Daniel; Ernst, Rolf


MARC21 XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <leader>00000nam##2200000uu#4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">automotive engineering</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">local area networks</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">quality of service</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">telecommunication traffic</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">virtual private networks</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20200120172619.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="001">55529</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="711" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="d">14-18 March 2016</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">DATE</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">2016 Design, Automation &amp; Test in Europe Conference &amp; Exhibition</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Dresden</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Institute of Computer and Network Engineering, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Ernst, Rolf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">498836</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">md5:6ad028e424f20c5bddedee4fbf36a431</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">https://zenodo.org/record/55529/files/DATE2016_BLS.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">open</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="y">Conference website</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">https://www.date-conference.com/</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2016-03-18</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="p">openaire</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">user-ecfunded</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">user-safure_h2020</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">oai:zenodo.org:55529</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Institute of Computer and Network Engineering, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Thiele, Daniel</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Formal Worst-Case Timing Analysis of Ethernet TSN's Burst-Limiting Shaper</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">user-ecfunded</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">user-safure_h2020</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="536" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">644080</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">SAFety and secURity by design for interconnected mixed-critical cyber-physical systems</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">opendefinition.org</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">&lt;p&gt;Future in-vehicle networks will use Ethernet as their communication backbone. As many automotive applications are latency-sensitive and have strict real-time requirements, a key challenge in automotive network design is the deterministic low-latency transport of latency-critical Ethernet frames. Time-sensitive networking (TSN) is an upcoming set of Ethernet standards, which address these requirements by specifying new quality of service mechanisms in the form of different traffic shapers. One of these traffic shapers is the burst-limiting shaper (BLS). In this paper, we evaluate whether BLS is able to fulfill these strict timing requirements. We present a formal timing analysis for BLS in order to compute worst-case latency bounds. We use a realistic automotive Ethernet setup to compare BLS against Ethernet AVB and Ethernet following IEEE 802.1Q.&lt;/p&gt;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="g">187-192</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">IEEE</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Dresden</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">2016 Design, Automation &amp; Test in Europe Conference &amp; Exhibition (DATE)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.55529</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">publication</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">conferencepaper</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
90
40
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 9092
Downloads 4040
Data volume 20.0 MB20.0 MB
Unique views 8890
Unique downloads 3838

Share

Cite as