5521077
doi
10.5281/zenodo.5521077
oai:zenodo.org:5521077
user-ke-prro
user-researchconsulting
Schmidt, Birgit
Göttingen State and University Library
Christensen-Dalsgaard, Birte
Aarhus University
Nüst, Daniel
University of Münster
Sondervan, Jeroen
Utrecht University
Jaquiery, Matt
University of Oxford
Langlais, Pierre Carl
Paris Sorbonne-CELSA
Woutersen, Saskia
Leiden University Library
Heise, Verena
University of Oxford / Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg
Neuman, Yrsa
Åbo Akademi University
Loffreda, Lucia
Research Consulting
Johnson, Rob
Research Consulting
The Art of Publishing Reproducible Research Outputs: Supporting emerging practices through cultural and technological innovation.
Chiarelli, Andrea
Research Consulting
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Reproducibility
Publishing
Research
Open Access
Open Science
Knowledge Exchange
<p>Reproducibility and transparency can be regarded (at least in experimental research) as a hallmark of research. The ability to reproduce research results in order to check their reliability is an important cornerstone of research that helps to guarantee the quality of research and to build on existing knowledge. The digital turn has brought more opportunities to document, share and verify research processes and outcomes. Consequently, there is an increasing demand for more transparency with regard to research processes and outcomes. This fits well with the open science agenda requiring, amongst others, open software, open data, and open access to publications even if openness alone does not guarantee reproducibility.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>The purpose of this activity of Knowledge Exchange was to explore current practices and barriers in the area of research reproducibility, with a focus on the publication and dissemination stage. We wanted to determine how technical and social infrastructures can support future developments in this area. In this work, we defined research reproducibility <strong>as cases where data and procedures shared by the authors of a study are used to obtain the same results as in their original work</strong>.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We captured the views of research funding organisations, research performing organisations, learned societies, researchers, academic publishers and infrastructure and service providers. We did a comprehensive literature review and a series of interviews and focus groups with a total of 51 contributors. The results of our activity give answers to the following questions:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>· What are the main benefits and barriers of publishing reproducible research outputs?</p>
<p>· What are the roles of the different stakeholders involved?</p>
<p>· How expensive are reproducibility checks?</p>
<p>· What kind of digital tools and infrastructure are needed to publish reproducible research output?</p>
Zenodo
2021-11-04
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
5521076
user-ke-prro
user-researchconsulting
1640349937.232623
3910253
md5:a9e4ff03bde226d4384a148fb4b10e9d
https://zenodo.org/records/5521077/files/Art of Publishing reproducible research output Nov 2021.pdf
public
10.5281/zenodo.5521076
isVersionOf
doi