Journal article Open Access
In the social sciences, there are different narratives of migration. In archaeology, however, this theme is conventionally tackled in many cases from within an old-fashioned traditional framework. Accordingly, some scholars consider it a mono-factorial approach that overlooks the complexity and diversity of other factors at play. Others ignore it, not wishing to be regarded as anachronistic scholars or as being trapped in culture-historical or diffusionist paradigms. In this short essay, I discuss migration in the context of social resilience by adopting approaches from human geography, such as translocality. I argue that this approach will be more promising in the context of migration in anthropological archaeology.
Name | Size | |
---|---|---|
Maziar TRAVAS.pdf
md5:d3013dee9a4df00f975c823e5e369614 |
306.5 kB | Download |
All versions | This version | |
---|---|---|
Views | 94 | 63 |
Downloads | 68 | 38 |
Data volume | 16.4 MB | 11.6 MB |
Unique views | 84 | 56 |
Unique downloads | 61 | 35 |