Journal article Open Access
Chang, Whatsin Wu
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd"> <identifier identifierType="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.5202258</identifier> <creators> <creator> <creatorName>Chang, Whatsin Wu</creatorName> <givenName>Whatsin Wu</givenName> <familyName>Chang</familyName> </creator> </creators> <titles> <title>Wrong Side of the Yangtze River: Did a Map Mistake by the World Health Organization Contribute to Premature Conclusions About SARS2's Origin?</title> </titles> <publisher>Zenodo</publisher> <publicationYear>2021</publicationYear> <subjects> <subject>SARS-CoV-2 origin, SARS2 origin, China, Wuhan, Wuchang district, World Health Organization</subject> </subjects> <dates> <date dateType="Issued">2021-08-14</date> </dates> <language>en</language> <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="JournalArticle"/> <alternateIdentifiers> <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://zenodo.org/record/5202258</alternateIdentifier> </alternateIdentifiers> <relatedIdentifiers> <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsVersionOf">10.5281/zenodo.5153949</relatedIdentifier> </relatedIdentifiers> <version>1.0</version> <rightsList> <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/legalcode">Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States</rights> <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights> </rightsList> <descriptions> <description descriptionType="Abstract"><p>Did a map mistake about the location of the first published COVID-19 patient contribute to pre-mature conclusions about where SARS2&ndash;the virus that causes COVID-19&ndash;came from? This report explores that question.</p> <p>The World Health Organization recently acknowledged that the report it convened to study the origin of SARS2 featured several &ldquo;unintended errors&rdquo; about early COVID-19 patients. The errors include where the first published SARS2 patient lived at the time of diagnosis, and this error is apparent in the report&rsquo;s maps. Subsequent to the error in that report, other researchers appear to have repeated the error in their maps and corresponding analysis.</p> <p>This raises an intriguing question: did a map mistake in a report published by the World Health Organization cause the authors of that report and other researchers to draw premature conclusionsabout the origins of SARS-CoV-2?</p> <p>A specific example of where a premature conclusion appears to have been drawn by researchers who used the erroneous data that appeared in World Health Organization maps is this statement in <em>The Origins of SARS-CoV-2: A Critical Review</em>, Holmes et al (2021):</p> <p><em>&ldquo;Examination of the locations of early cases shows that most cluster around the Huanan market, located north of the Yangtze river (Fig. 1a-e)... There is no epidemiological link to any other locality in Wuhan... </em></p> <p>The analysis in the current study proceeds by first providing context about the ongoing debate about the origin of SARS2.&nbsp; That is followed by an analysis of maps from the World Health Organization&rsquo;s report on the origin of SARS2, as well as publicly available information and investigative reporting by Washington Post reporters about the location and characteristics of the first published COVID-19 patient. This study then reviews a series of heatmaps of COVID-19 infections in Wuhan, where&nbsp; each&nbsp; map&nbsp; uses&nbsp; a&nbsp; different&nbsp; methodology&nbsp; but&nbsp; all&nbsp; show&nbsp; a&nbsp; similar&nbsp; pattern&nbsp; for&nbsp; the&nbsp; progression of COVID-19 through Wuhan&rsquo;s districts, consistently showing that Wuchang district--not the district where the Huanan seafood market is located--was hottest with COVID-19 infections earliest.&nbsp; Finally, this report explores whether erroneous mapping of the first COVID-19 case contributed to premature conclusions about the origin of SARS2 and concludes by discussing research and public policy implications.</p></description> <description descriptionType="Other">Added: Table of first patient characteristics reported by multiple independent sources. Corrected: Error that said Peter Daszak didn't sign the Lancet letter he organized - in fact he did. Known error: The accountant Chen from Wuchang district was not the first published COVID case: https://twitter.com/franciscodeasis/status/1397227238764990469?</description> </descriptions> </resource>
All versions | This version | |
---|---|---|
Views | 3,858 | 2,392 |
Downloads | 1,253 | 556 |
Data volume | 20.7 GB | 9.2 GB |
Unique views | 3,191 | 2,025 |
Unique downloads | 1,109 | 507 |