Published February 22, 2019 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Data from: The prevalence of MS in the United States: a population-based estimate using health claims data

  • 1. Georgetown University
  • 2. University of Maryland
  • 3. University of Colorado, Aurora*
  • 4. Stanford University
  • 5. Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena*
  • 6. University of Manitoba
  • 7. University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • 8. McKing Consulting Corp, Atlanta, GA*
  • 9. University of British Columbia
  • 10. Brown University

Description

Objective: To generate a national multiple sclerosis (MS) prevalence estimate for the United States by applying a validated algorithm to multiple administrative health claims (AHC) datasets. Methods: A validated algorithm was applied to private, military, and public AHC datasets to identify adult cases of MS between 2008 and 2010. In each dataset, we determined the 3-year cumulative prevalence overall and stratified by age, sex, and census region. We applied insurance-specific and stratum-specific estimates to the 2010 US Census data and pooled the findings to calculate the 2010 prevalence of MS in the United States cumulated over 3 years. We also estimated the 2010 prevalence cumulated over 10 years using 2 models and extrapolated our estimate to 2017. Results: The estimated 2010 prevalence of MS in the US adult population cumulated over 10 years was 309.2 per 100,000 (95% confidence interval [CI] 308.1–310.1), representing 727,344 cases. During the same time period, the MS prevalence was 450.1 per 100,000 (95% CI 448.1–451.6) for women and 159.7 (95% CI 158.7–160.6) for men (female:male ratio 2.8). The estimated 2010 prevalence of MS was highest in the 55- to 64-year age group. A US north-south decreasing prevalence gradient was identified. The estimated MS prevalence is also presented for 2017. Conclusion: The estimated US national MS prevalence for 2010 is the highest reported to date and provides evidence that the north-south gradient persists. Our rigorous algorithm-based approach to estimating prevalence is efficient and has the potential to be used for other chronic neurologic conditions.

Notes

Files

Files (28.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:4875b7e53d9ca13eb4a76b2a2dd67038
28.5 kB Download

Additional details

Related works