Report Open Access
Sam Harrison;
Abhishek Dasgupta;
Simon Waldman;
Alex Henderson;
Christopher Lovell
{ "inLanguage": { "alternateName": "eng", "@type": "Language", "name": "English" }, "description": "<p>In this article, we attempt to answer the question of how reproducible research software should be by defining four levels of reproducibility, suggesting criteria to help you decide which level your research software should be at, and recommending practices to reach these levels of reproducibility. The article is the result of a discussion session at the Software Sustainability Institute Fellows Online Selection Day 2021.</p>", "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode", "creator": [ { "affiliation": "UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology", "@id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8491-4720", "@type": "Person", "name": "Sam Harrison" }, { "affiliation": "University of Oxford", "@id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4420-0656", "@type": "Person", "name": "Abhishek Dasgupta" }, { "affiliation": "University of Hull", "@id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4811-398X", "@type": "Person", "name": "Simon Waldman" }, { "affiliation": "University of Manchester", "@type": "Person", "name": "Alex Henderson" }, { "affiliation": "University of Hertfordshire", "@type": "Person", "name": "Christopher Lovell" } ], "headline": "How reproducible should research software be?", "image": "https://zenodo.org/static/img/logos/zenodo-gradient-round.svg", "datePublished": "2021-05-14", "url": "https://zenodo.org/record/4761867", "keywords": [ "reproducibility", "research software", "software sustainability" ], "@context": "https://schema.org/", "identifier": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4761867", "@id": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4761867", "@type": "ScholarlyArticle", "name": "How reproducible should research software be?" }
All versions | This version | |
---|---|---|
Views | 1,027 | 1,027 |
Downloads | 649 | 649 |
Data volume | 135.7 MB | 135.7 MB |
Unique views | 945 | 945 |
Unique downloads | 579 | 579 |