May 14, 2021 Report Open Access

Sam Harrison; Abhishek Dasgupta; Simon Waldman; Alex Henderson; Christopher Lovell

DataCite XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd">
  <identifier identifierType="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4761867</identifier>
  <creators>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Sam Harrison</creatorName>
      <nameIdentifier nameIdentifierScheme="ORCID" schemeURI="http://orcid.org/">0000-0001-8491-4720</nameIdentifier>
      <affiliation>UK Centre for Ecology &amp; Hydrology</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Abhishek Dasgupta</creatorName>
      <nameIdentifier nameIdentifierScheme="ORCID" schemeURI="http://orcid.org/">0000-0003-4420-0656</nameIdentifier>
      <affiliation>University of Oxford</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Simon Waldman</creatorName>
      <nameIdentifier nameIdentifierScheme="ORCID" schemeURI="http://orcid.org/">0000-0003-4811-398X</nameIdentifier>
      <affiliation>University of Hull</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Alex Henderson</creatorName>
      <affiliation>University of Manchester</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Christopher Lovell</creatorName>
      <affiliation>University of Hertfordshire</affiliation>
    </creator>
  </creators>
  <titles>
    <title>How reproducible should research software be?</title>
  </titles>
  <publisher>Zenodo</publisher>
  <publicationYear>2021</publicationYear>
  <subjects>
    <subject>reproducibility</subject>
    <subject>research software</subject>
    <subject>software sustainability</subject>
  </subjects>
  <dates>
    <date dateType="Issued">2021-05-14</date>
  </dates>
  <language>en</language>
  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Report"/>
  <alternateIdentifiers>
    <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://zenodo.org/record/4761867</alternateIdentifier>
  </alternateIdentifiers>
  <relatedIdentifiers>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsVersionOf">10.5281/zenodo.4761866</relatedIdentifier>
  </relatedIdentifiers>
  <rightsList>
    <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</rights>
    <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights>
  </rightsList>
  <descriptions>
    <description descriptionType="Abstract">&lt;p&gt;In this article, we attempt to answer the question of how reproducible research software should be by defining four levels of reproducibility, suggesting criteria to help you decide which level your research software should be at, and recommending practices to reach these levels of reproducibility. The article is the result of a discussion session at the Software Sustainability Institute Fellows Online Selection Day 2021.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <description descriptionType="Other">{"references": ["Wilson et al (2017). Good enough practices in scientific computing. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005510", "Lee et al (2021). Barely sufficient practices in scientific computing. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100206", "McArthur (2019). Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Replicability: Tackling the 3R challenge in biointerface science and engineering. doi: 10.1116/1.5093621"]}</description>
  </descriptions>
</resource>