Dataset Open Access

Species packing and the latitudinal gradient in local beta-diversity

Cao, Ke; Condit, Richard; Mi, Xiangcheng; Chen, Lei; Xu, Wubing; Burslem, David F. R. P.; Cai, Chunrong; Cao, Min; Chang, Li-Wan; Chu, Chengjin; Du, Hu; Ediriweera, Sisira; Gunatilleke, C. S. V.; Gunatilleke, I. U. A. N.; Hao, Zhanqing; Li, Jinbo; Jin, Guangze; Li, Buhang; Liu, Yankun; Li, Yide; O'Brien, Michael J.; Qiao, Xiujuan; Ni, Hongwei; Shen, Guochun; Wang, Xihua; Tian, Songyan; Yang, Libing; Xu, Han; Xu, Yaozhan; Yap, Sandra L.; Ye, Wanhui; Lian, Juyu; Yu, Mingjian; Chang-Yang, Chia-Hao; Su, Sheng-Hsin; Guo, Yili; Zeng, Fuping; Li, Xiankun; Sun, I-Fang; Zhu, Li; Zhu, Daoguang; Ma, Keping; Svenning, Jens-Christian

The decline in species richness at higher latitudes is among the most fundamental patterns in ecology. Whether changes in species composition across space (beta-diversity) contribute to this gradient of overall local species richness (gamma diversity) remains hotly debated. Previous studies that failed to resolve the issue suffered from a well-known tendency for small samples in areas with high gamma-diversity to have inflated measures of beta-diversity. We provide here a novel analytical test, using beta-diversity metrics that correct the gamma-diversity and sampling bias, to compare beta-diversity and species-packing across a latitudinal gradient in tree species richness of 21 large forest plots along a wide environmental gradient in East Asia. We demonstrate that after accounting for topography and correcting the gamma-diversity bias, tropical forests still have higher beta-diversity than temperate analogs. This suggests that local beta-diversity contributes to the latitudinal species richness gradient as a component of gamma-diversity. Moreover, niche specialization and niche marginality (a measure of niche spacing along a habitat gradient) also increases towards the equator, after removing the effect of topographic heterogeneity. This supports the hypothesis of tighter species packing and larger niche space in tropical forests while demonstrating the importance of local processes in controlling beta-diversity.The decline in species richness at higher latitudes is among the most fundamental patterns in ecology. Whether changes in species composition across space (beta-diversity) contribute to this gradient of overall local species richness (gamma diversity) remains hotly debated. Previous studies that failed to resolve the issue suffered from a well-known tendency for small samples in areas with high gamma-diversity to have inflated measures of beta-diversity. We provide here a novel analytical test, using beta-diversity metrics that correct the gamma-diversity and sampling bias, to compare beta-diversity and species-packing across a latitudinal gradient in tree species richness of 21 large forest plots along a wide environmental gradient in East Asia. We demonstrate that after accounting for topography and correcting the gamma-diversity bias, tropical forests still have higher beta-diversity than temperate analogs. This suggests that local beta-diversity contributes to the latitudinal species richness gradient as a component of gamma-diversity. Moreover, niche specialization and niche marginality (a measure of niche spacing along a habitat gradient) also increases towards the equator, after removing the effect of topographic heterogeneity. This supports the hypothesis of tighter species packing and larger niche space in tropical forests while demonstrating the importance of local processes in controlling beta-diversity.

Funding provided by: Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences*
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number: XDB310300

Funding provided by: National Natural Science Foundation of China
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001809
Award Number: 31770478

Funding provided by: Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number: XDB310300

Files (42.0 kB)
Name Size
Data_for_supporting_Figures_1-3.xlsx
md5:e56bf1b7e85f7fd840c4b16d8b28de3e
24.4 kB Download
R_code_for_the_analyses.r
md5:ef16d6fa5e710cc75c5a6acf84ad6f44
17.6 kB Download
19
8
views
downloads
Views 19
Downloads 8
Data volume 147.7 kB
Unique views 19
Unique downloads 8

Share

Cite as