August 1, 2020 Report Open Access

Daoyu Zhang

Dublin Core Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Daoyu Zhang</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2020-08-01</dc:date>
  <dc:description>To this date, the most critical piece of evidence on the purposed “natural origin” theory of SARS-CoV-2, was the sequence known as RaTG13, allegedly collected from a single fecal sample from Rhinolophus Affinis. Understanding the provenance of RaTG13 is critical on the ongoing debate of the Origins of SARS-CoV-2. However, this sample is allegedly “used up” and therefore can no longer be accessed nor sequenced independently [1], and the only available data was the 3 related Genbank accessions: MN996532.1, SRX7724752 and SRX8357956.

We report these datasets possessed multiple significant anomalies, and the provenence of the promised claims of RaTG13 or it’s role in proving a “probable bat origin”[2] of SARS-CoV-2 can not be satisfied nor possibly be confirmed.</dc:description>
  <dc:identifier>https://zenodo.org/record/4695356</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>10.5281/zenodo.4695356</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>oai:zenodo.org:4695356</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>doi:10.5281/zenodo.3969271</dc:relation>
  <dc:relation>url:https://zenodo.org/communities/covid-19</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
  <dc:subject>RaTG13</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Raw Data</dc:subject>
  <dc:title>Anomalies in BatCoV/RaTG13 sequencing and provenance</dc:title>
  <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/report</dc:type>
  <dc:type>publication-report</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>