Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published April 30, 2009 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

Adult butterfly feeding-nectar flower associations: constraints of taxonomic affiliation, butterfly, and nectar flower morphology

Authors/Creators

Description

Tiple, Ashish D., Khurad, Arun M., Dennis, Roger L.H. (2009): Adult butterfly feeding-nectar flower associations: constraints of taxonomic affiliation, butterfly, and nectar flower morphology. Journal of Natural History 43 (13-14): 855-884, DOI: 10.1080/00222930802610568, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222930802610568

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted. <a href="https://zenodo.org/account/settings/login?next=https://zenodo.org/records/4666659">Log in</a> to check if you have access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FFE1294BFFE20E77FFABFE2E816CFFF6

Has part
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.4666661 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.4666663 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.4666665 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.4666667 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.4666669 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.4666671 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.4666673 (DOI)

References

  • Agosta SJ, Janzen DH. 2005. Body size distributions of large Costa Rican dry forest moths and the underlying relationship between plant and pollinator morphology. Oikos. 108:183-193.
  • Alexandersson R, Johnson S. 2002. Pollinator-mediated selection on flower-tube length in a hawkmoth-pollinated Gladiolus (Iridaceae). Proc R Soc Lond B. 269:631-636.
  • Barth FG. 1991. Insects and flowers. The biology of a partnership. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
  • Berwaerts K, Van Dyck H, Vints E, Matthysen E. 2001. Effect of manipulated wing characteristics and basking posture on thermal properties of the butterfly Pararge aegeria (L.). J Zool. 255:261-267.
  • Betts CR, Wootton RJ. 1988. Wing shape and flight behaviour in butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea): a preliminary analysis. J Exp Biol. 138:271-288.
  • Braby MF, Jones RE. 1995. Reproductive patterns and resource allocation in tropical butterflies - influence of adult diet and seasonal phenotype on fecundity, longevity and egg size. Oikos. 72:189-204.
  • Chittka L, Spaethe J, Schmidt A, Hickelsberger A. 2001. Adaptation, constraint, and chance in the evolution of flower color and pollinator color vision. In: Chittka L, Thomson JD, editors. Cognitive ecology of pollination: animal behaviour and floral evolution. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. p. 106-126.
  • Corbet SA. 2000. Butterfly nectaring flowers: butterfly morphology and flower form. Entomol Exp Appl. 96:289-298.
  • Courtney SP. 1986. The ecology of pierid butterflies: dynamics and interactions. Adv Ecol Res. 15:51-116.
  • Dennis RLH. 1993. Butterflies and climate change. Manchester (UK): Manchester University Press.
  • Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Van Dyck H. 2003. Towards a resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint. Oikos. 102:417-426.
  • Dennis RLH, Hardy PB, Shreeve TG. 2006. Habitats and resources: the need for a resourcebased definition to conserve butterflies. Extinction Risk Issue. Biodiv Conserv. 15:1943-1966.
  • Dennis RLH, Hardy PB, Shreeve TG, Sheppard DA. 2007. Species conservation and landscape management: a habitat perspective. In: New T, Stewart A, Lewis O, editors. Insect conservation biology. Wallingford (UK): CABI. p. 92-126.
  • Dobson H. 1994. Floral volatiles in insect biology. In: Bernays E, editor. Insect-plant interactions. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press, vol. 5, p. 47-81.
  • Erhardt A, Mevi-Schutz J. Forthcoming 2009. Adult food resources in butterflies. In: Settele J, Shreeve TG, Konvicka M, Van Dyck H, editors. Ecology of butterflies in Europe. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
  • Faegri K, Van der Pijl L. 1979. The principles of pollination ecology. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • Feber RE, Smith H, Macdonald DW. 1996. The effects of butterfly abundance on the management of uncropped edges of arable fields. J Appl Ecol. 33:1191-1205.
  • Frankino WA, Zwaan BJ, Stern DL, Brakefield PM. 2005. Natural selection and developmental constraints in the evolution of allometries. Science. 307:718-720.
  • Frankino WA, Zwaan BJ, Stern DL, Brakefield PM. 2007. Internal and external constraints in the evolution of morphological allometries in a butterfly. Evolution. 61:2958-2970.
  • Gilbert LE. 1984. The biology of butterflies. In: Vane-Wright RI, Ackery PR, editors. The biology of butterflies. London (UK): Academic Press. p. 41-54.
  • Goulson D, Ollerton J, Sluman C. 1997a. Foraging strategies in the small skipper butterfly, Thymelicus flavus: when to switch? Anim Behav. 53:1009-1016.
  • Goulson D, Stout JC, Hawson SA. 1997b. Can flower constancy in nectaring butterflies be explained by Darwin's interference hypothesis? Oecologia. 112:225-231.
  • Grant V, Grant KA. 1983. Hawkmoth pollination of Mirabilis longiflora (Nyctaginaceae). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 80:1298-1299.
  • Hardy PB, Sparks TH, Isaac NJB, Dennis RLH. 2007. Specialism for larval and adult consumer resources among British butterflies: implications for conservation. Biol Conserv. 138:440-452.
  • Heinrich B. 1976. Resource partitioning among some eusocial insects: bumblebees. Ecology. 57:874-889.
  • Ilse D. 1928. Uber den farbensinn der tagfalter. Z Verl Physiol. 8:658-692.
  • Ilse D, Vaidya VG. 1956. Spontaneous feeding response to colours in Papilio demoleus L. Proc Ind Acad Sci B. 43:23-31.
  • Jennersten O. 1984. Flower visitation and pollination efficiency of some North European butterflies. Oecologia. 63:80-89.
  • Johnson SD, Steiner KE. 1997. Long-tongued fly pollination and evolution of floral spur length in the Disadraconis complex (Orchidaceae). Evolution. 51:45-53.
  • Kandori I, Ohsaki N. 1996. The learning abilities of the white cabbage butterfly Pieris rapae foraging for flowers. Res Pop Ecol. 38:111-117.
  • Karlsson B. 1995. Resource allocation and mating systems in butterflies. Evolution. 49:955-961.
  • Karlsson B. 1996. Male reproductive reserves in relation to mating system in butterflies: a comparative study. Proc R Soc Lond B. 263:187-192.
  • Kevan PG, Baker HG. 1983. Insect as flower visitors and pollinators. Annu Rev Entomol. 28:407-453.
  • Kingsolver JG, Daniel TL. 1979. On the mechanics and energetics of nectar feeding in butterflies. J Theor Biol. 76:167-179.
  • Kodric-Brown A, Brown JH, Byers GS, Gori DF. 1984. Organization of a tropical island community of hummingbirds and flowers. Ecology. 65:1358-1368.
  • Krenn HW, Plant JD, Szucsich NU. 2005. Mouthparts of flower-visiting insects. Arthropod Structure Dev. 34:1-40.
  • Kunte K. 2007. Allometry and functional constraints on proboscis lengths in butterflies. Funct Ecol. 21:982-987.
  • Kunte K. 2008. Competition and species diversity: removal of dominant species increases diversity in Costa Rican butterfly communities. Oikos. 117:69-76.
  • Kunze J, Gumbert A. 2001. The combined effect of color and odor on flower choice behavior of bumble bees in flower mimicry systems. Behav Ecol. 12:447-456.
  • Legendre P, Legendre L. 1998. Numerical ecology. Amsterdam (The Netherlands): Elsevier.
  • Lewis AC. 1989. Flower visit consistency in Pieris rapae, the cabbage butterfly. J Anim Ecol. 58:1-13.
  • Lewis AC, Lipani GA. 1990. Learning and flower use in butterflies: hypotheses from honey bees. In: Bernays EA, editor. Insect-plant interactions. Vol. 2. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press. p. 95-110.
  • Lunau K, Maier EJ. 1995. Innate colour preferences of flower visitors. J Comp Physiol A. 177:1-19.
  • May PG. 1985. Nectar uptake rates and optimal nectar concentrations of two butterfly species. Oecologia. 66:381-386.
  • May PG. 1992. Flower selection and the dynamics of lipid reserves in two nectarivorous butterflies. Ecology. 73:2181-2191.
  • Murphy DD, Menninger MS, Ehrlich PR. 1984. Nectar source as a determinant of oviposition host species in Euphydryas chalcedona. Oecologia. 62:269-271.
  • Nilsson LA. 1988. The evolution of flowers with deep corolla tubes. Nature. 334:147-149.
  • Nilsson LA. 1998. Deep flowers for long tongues. Trends Ecol Evol. 13:259-260.
  • Nilsson LA, Jonsson L, Rason L, Randrianjohany E. 1985. Monophily and pollination mechanisms in Angraecum arachnites Schltr. (Orchidaceae) in a guild of long-tongued hawk-moths (Sphingidae) in Madagascar. Biol J Linn Soc. 26:1-19.
  • Omura H, Honda K. 2005. Priority of color over scent during flower visitation by adult Vanessa indica butterflies. Oecologia. 142:588-596.
  • Pivnick KA, McNeil JN. 1985. Effects of nectar concentration on butterfly feeding: measured feeding rates for Thymelicus lineola (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) and a general feeding model for adult Lepidoptera. Oecologia. 66:226-237.
  • Pollard E, Yates TJ. 1993. Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation. London (UK): Chapman and Hall.
  • Porter K, Steel CA, Thomas JA. 1992. Butterflies and communities. In: Dennis RLH, editor. The ecology of butterflies in Britain. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press. p. 139- 177.
  • Scherer C, Kolb G. 1987a. Behavioral experiments on the visual processing of color stimuli in Pieris brassicae L. (Lepidoptera). J Comp Physiol A. 160:645-656.
  • Scherer C, Kolb G. 1987b. The influence of color stimuli on visually controlled behavior in Aglais urticae L. and Pararge aegeria L. (Lepidoptera). J Comp Physiol A. 61:891-898.
  • Schoonhoven LM, Jermy T, van Loon JJA. 1998. Insects and flowers: the beauty of mutualism. In: Schoonhoven LM, Jermy T, van Loon JJA, editors. Insect-plant biology. London (UK): Chapman and Hall. p. 315-342.
  • Shreeve TG. 1992. Adult behaviour. In: Dennis RLH, editor. The ecology of butterflies in Britain. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press. p. 22-45.
  • Steppan SJ. 2000. Flexural stiffness patterns of butterfly wings (Papilionoidea). J Res Lepidopt. 35:61-77.
  • Swihart SL. 1970. The neural basis of colour vision in the butterfly, Papilio troilus. J Insect Physiol. 16:1623-1636.
  • Temeles EJ, Kress WJ. 2003. Adaptation in a plant-hummingbird association. Science. 300:630-633.
  • Thompson DW. 1917. On growth and form. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
  • Tiple AD, Deshmukh VP, Dennis RLH. 2006. Factors influencing nectar plant resource visits by butterflies on a university campus: implications for conservation. Nota Lepidopt. 28:213-224.
  • Tudor O, Dennis RLH, Greatorex-Davies JN, Sparks TH. 2004. Flower preferences of woodland butterflies in the UK: nectaring specialists are species of conservation concern. Biol Conserv. 119:397-403.
  • Van Dyck H, Matthysen E, Dhondt AA. 1997. Mate-locating strategies are related to relative body length and wing colour in the speckled wood butterfly Pararge aegeria. Ecol Entomol. 22:116-120.
  • Watt WB, Hoch PC, Mills SG. 1974. Nectar resource use by Colias butterflies: chemical and visual aspects. Oecologia. 14:353-374.
  • Weiss MR. 2001. Vision and learning in some neglected pollinators: beetles, flies, moths, and butterflies. In: Chittka L, Thomson JD, editors. Cognitive ecology of pollination - animal behaviour and floral evolution. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. p. 171-190.
  • Weiss MR, Papaj DR. 2003. Colour learning in two behavioural contexts: how much can a butterfly keep in mind? Anim Behav. 65:425-434.
  • Wheeler D. 1996. The role of nourishment in oogenesis. Annu Rev Entomol. 41:407-431.
  • Wickman P-O. 1992. Sexual selection and butterfly design - a comparative study. Evolution. 46:1525-1536.
  • Wickman P-O, Karlsson B. 1989. Abdomen size, body size and the reproductive effort of insects. Oikos. 56:209-214.
  • Wiklund C, Forsberg J. 1991. Sexual size dimorphism in relation to female polygamy and protandry in butterflies: a comparative study of Swedish Pieridae and Satyridae. Oikos. 60:373-381.