Presentation Open Access

Digital Twins Are Not Monozygotic - Cross-Replicating ADAS Testing in Two Industry-Grade Automotive Simulators

Borg, Markus

DataCite XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi="" xmlns="" xsi:schemaLocation="">
  <identifier identifierType="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4662152</identifier>
      <creatorName>Borg, Markus</creatorName>
    <title>Digital Twins Are Not Monozygotic - Cross-Replicating ADAS Testing in Two Industry-Grade Automotive Simulators</title>
    <subject>software engineering</subject>
    <subject>software testing</subject>
    <subject>search-based software testing</subject>
    <subject>advanced driver-assistance systems</subject>
    <subject>automotive simulators</subject>
    <date dateType="Issued">2021-04-04</date>
  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">Presentation</resourceType>
    <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url"></alternateIdentifier>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsVersionOf">10.5281/zenodo.4662151</relatedIdentifier>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsPartOf"></relatedIdentifier>
    <rights rightsURI="">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</rights>
    <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights>
    <description descriptionType="Abstract">&lt;p&gt;The increasing levels of software- and data-intensive driving automation call for an evolution of automotive software testing. As a recommended practice of the Verification and Validation (V&amp;amp;V) process of ISO/PAS 21448, a candidate standard for safety of the intended functionality for road vehicles, simulation-based testing has the potential to reduce both risks and costs. There is a growing body of research on devising test automation techniques using simulators for Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems (ADAS). However, how similar are the results if the same test scenarios are executed in different simulators? We conduct a replication study of applying a Search-Based Software Testing (SBST) solution to a real-world ADAS (PeVi, a pedestrian vision detection system) using two different commercial simulators, namely, TASS/Siemens PreScan and ESI Pro-SiVIC. Based on a minimalistic scene, we compare critical test scenarios generated using our SBST solution in these two simulators. We show that SBST can be used to effectively generate critical test scenarios in both simulators, and the test results obtained from the two simulators can reveal several weaknesses of the ADAS under test. However, executing the same test scenarios in the two simulators leads to notable differences in the details of the test outputs, in particular, related to (1) safety violations revealed by tests, and (2) dynamics of cars and pedestrians. Based on our findings, we recommend future V&amp;amp;V plans to include multiple simulators to support robust simulation-based testing and to base test objectives on measures that are less dependant on the internals of the simulators.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
All versions This version
Views 114114
Downloads 1111
Data volume 781.2 MB781.2 MB
Unique views 113113
Unique downloads 1010


Cite as