Poster Open Access

Open science recommendations for a multidisciplinary Faculty – goals, process & challenges

Ari J. Asmi

DCAT Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="" xmlns:adms="" xmlns:dc="" xmlns:dct="" xmlns:dctype="" xmlns:dcat="" xmlns:duv="" xmlns:foaf="" xmlns:frapo="" xmlns:geo="" xmlns:gsp="" xmlns:locn="" xmlns:org="" xmlns:owl="" xmlns:prov="" xmlns:rdfs="" xmlns:schema="" xmlns:skos="" xmlns:vcard="" xmlns:wdrs="">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="">
    <rdf:type rdf:resource=""/>
    <dct:type rdf:resource=""/>
    <dct:identifier rdf:datatype=""></dct:identifier>
    <foaf:page rdf:resource=""/>
        <rdf:type rdf:resource=""/>
        <foaf:name>Ari J. Asmi</foaf:name>
            <foaf:name>University of Helsinki</foaf:name>
    <dct:title>Open science recommendations for a multidisciplinary Faculty – goals, process &amp; challenges</dct:title>
    <dct:issued rdf:datatype="">2021</dct:issued>
    <dct:issued rdf:datatype="">2021-03-29</dct:issued>
    <dct:language rdf:resource=""/>
    <owl:sameAs rdf:resource=""/>
        <skos:notation rdf:datatype=""></skos:notation>
    <dct:isVersionOf rdf:resource=""/>
    <dct:isPartOf rdf:resource=""/>
    <dct:description>&lt;p&gt;This presentation describes the goals, process and some of the challenges faced, when developing a common Open Science policy for a medium-sized science-oriented university faculty, as well as the resulting recommendations and the response from the Faculty leadership and researchers. The overall process includes landscape analysis of existing policies, boundary conditions (resources, etc.), services. and needs, finding a representative working group and drafting the overall recommendations in a way which can be widely accepted. The presentation will go more in detail, but the overall recommendations can be shortly described in the following seven principles:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Recommendation 1: Set the overall faculty policy on science products: &amp;ldquo;as open as possible, as closed as necessary&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Recommendation 2: Value the open science products in the staff annual development discussions&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Recommendation 3: Consider open science products in unit, department and tenure track evaluations&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Recommendation 4: Require listing of Open Science Products in recruiting&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Recommendation 5: Create a short, clear and well documented knowledge base of open science best practices in the faculty&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Recommendation 6: Organise structured staff training on the best practices, facilitate peer support, and open science culture in the Faculty&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Recommendation 7: Develop open science content for curriculum MSc and Doctoral programs&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The poster includes the results from the initial landscape analysis of the Faculty needs, a short descriptions of the feedback received from the different groups engaged in the activity, and status report and encountered challenges for application of the principles.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</dct:description>
    <dct:accessRights rdf:resource=""/>
      <dct:RightsStatement rdf:about="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">
        <rdfs:label>Open Access</rdfs:label>
        <dct:license rdf:resource=""/>
        <dcat:accessURL rdf:resource=""/>
        <dcat:accessURL rdf:resource=""/>
        <dcat:downloadURL rdf:resource=""/>
        <dcat:accessURL rdf:resource=""/>
        <dcat:downloadURL rdf:resource=""/>
All versions This version
Views 370370
Downloads 6565
Data volume 15.4 MB15.4 MB
Unique views 248248
Unique downloads 4444


Cite as