Caution: Unverified Contents
Papers are not peer-reviewed by Zenodo, and must be regarded as preliminary until peer-reviewed by multiple experts in the field. Thus it should not be regarded as conclusive, or be reported in news media as established information, as the main claims may not stand the test of scientific scrutiny.
Working paper Open Access
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"> <dc:creator>Quay, Steven Carl</dc:creator> <dc:date>2021-03-29</dc:date> <dc:description>A Bayesian analysis concludes beyond a reasonable doubt that SARS-CoV-2 is not a natural zoonosis but instead is laboratory derived.</dc:description> <dc:identifier>https://zenodo.org/record/4642956</dc:identifier> <dc:identifier>10.5281/zenodo.4642956</dc:identifier> <dc:identifier>oai:zenodo.org:4642956</dc:identifier> <dc:relation>doi:10.5281/zenodo.4470232</dc:relation> <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights> <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights> <dc:subject>SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus COVID-19 origin Bayesian analysis laboratory-acquired infection zoonosis</dc:subject> <dc:title>A Bayesian analysis concludes beyond a reasonable doubt that SARS-CoV-2 is not a natural zoonosis but instead is laboratory derived</dc:title> <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaper</dc:type> <dc:type>publication-workingpaper</dc:type> </oai_dc:dc>
All versions | This version | |
---|---|---|
Views | 233,419 | 48,229 |
Downloads | 148,805 | 23,453 |
Data volume | 2.1 TB | 210.7 GB |
Unique views | 188,334 | 38,159 |
Unique downloads | 123,838 | 20,495 |