Caution: Unverified Contents

Papers are not peer-reviewed by Zenodo, and must be regarded as preliminary until peer-reviewed by multiple experts in the field. Thus it should not be regarded as conclusive, or be reported in news media as established information, as the main claims may not stand the test of scientific scrutiny.

Working paper Open Access

A Bayesian analysis concludes beyond a reasonable doubt that SARS-CoV-2 is not a natural zoonosis but instead is laboratory derived

Quay, Steven Carl

GeoJSON Export

{
  "type": "FeatureCollection", 
  "features": []
}
233,572
148,842
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 233,57248,262
Downloads 148,84223,469
Data volume 2.1 TB210.8 GB
Unique views 188,46938,190
Unique downloads 123,86620,508
More info on how stats are collected.
Indexed in
Publication date:
March 29, 2021
DOI:
10.5281/zenodo.4642956

Zenodo DOI Badge

DOI 

10.5281/zenodo.4642956

Markdown 

[![DOI](https://zenodo.org/badge/DOI/10.5281/zenodo.4642956.svg)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4642956)

reStructedText 

.. image:: https://zenodo.org/badge/DOI/10.5281/zenodo.4642956.svg
   :target: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4642956

HTML 

<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4642956"><img src="https://zenodo.org/badge/DOI/10.5281/zenodo.4642956.svg" alt="DOI"></a>

Image URL 

https://zenodo.org/badge/DOI/10.5281/zenodo.4642956.svg

Target URL 

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4642956

Keyword(s):
SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus COVID-19 origin Bayesian analysis laboratory-acquired infection zoonosis
License (for files):
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Versions

Version 3 10.5281/zenodo.4642956 Mar 29, 2021
Version 2 10.5281/zenodo.4477081 Jan 29, 2021
Version Version 1 10.5281/zenodo.4470233 Jan 29, 2021
Cite all versions? You can cite all versions by using the DOI 10.5281/zenodo.4470232. This DOI represents all versions, and will always resolve to the latest one. Read more.

Share

Cite as

Export