Journal article Open Access

The Debate between Explanation and Understanding in von Wright and Apel. A Double Interpretation of the Leibnizian Proposals

Ortiz de Landázuri, Carlos


DCAT Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:adms="http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dctype="http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/" xmlns:dcat="http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat#" xmlns:duv="http://www.w3.org/ns/duv#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:frapo="http://purl.org/cerif/frapo/" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:gsp="http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql#" xmlns:locn="http://www.w3.org/ns/locn#" xmlns:org="http://www.w3.org/ns/org#" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:prov="http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:schema="http://schema.org/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:vcard="http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns#" xmlns:wdrs="http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4625153">
    <dct:identifier rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anyURI">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4625153</dct:identifier>
    <foaf:page rdf:resource="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4625153"/>
    <dct:creator>
      <rdf:Description>
        <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Agent"/>
        <foaf:name>Ortiz de Landázuri, Carlos</foaf:name>
        <foaf:givenName>Carlos</foaf:givenName>
        <foaf:familyName>Ortiz de Landázuri</foaf:familyName>
        <org:memberOf>
          <foaf:Organization>
            <foaf:name>Universidad de Navarra, Spain</foaf:name>
          </foaf:Organization>
        </org:memberOf>
      </rdf:Description>
    </dct:creator>
    <dct:title>The Debate between Explanation and Understanding in von Wright and Apel. A Double Interpretation of the Leibnizian Proposals</dct:title>
    <dct:publisher>
      <foaf:Agent>
        <foaf:name>Zenodo</foaf:name>
      </foaf:Agent>
    </dct:publisher>
    <dct:issued rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#gYear">2020</dct:issued>
    <dcat:keyword>Wittgenstein</dcat:keyword>
    <dcat:keyword>Foundation</dcat:keyword>
    <dcat:keyword>Logical Positivism</dcat:keyword>
    <dcat:keyword>Universal Language</dcat:keyword>
    <dct:issued rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#date">2020-03-31</dct:issued>
    <dct:language rdf:resource="http://publications.europa.eu/resource/authority/language/SPA"/>
    <owl:sameAs rdf:resource="https://zenodo.org/record/4625153"/>
    <adms:identifier>
      <adms:Identifier>
        <skos:notation rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anyURI">https://zenodo.org/record/4625153</skos:notation>
        <adms:schemeAgency>url</adms:schemeAgency>
      </adms:Identifier>
    </adms:identifier>
    <dct:relation rdf:resource="http://issn.org/resource/ISSN/2254-0601"/>
    <dct:isVersionOf rdf:resource="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3949290"/>
    <dct:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://zenodo.org/communities/disputatio"/>
    <dct:description>&lt;p&gt;G. H. von Wright and Karl&amp;ndash;Otto Apel have conducted a review of Leibniz&amp;#39;s presence throughout the development of analytic philosophy after Russell and the first Wittgenstein. In both cases it was intended to solve the crisis of foundation generated by the initial positivist&amp;ndash;logical proposals. Both Russell and the first Wittgenstein would have initially proposed some constitutive presuppositions of a dogmatic nature, which they would borrow from the Monadology of 1714 of the last Leibniz. However, these principles were in clear contradiction with respect to the unlimitedly revisionist regulatory ideal on which the elaboration of a truly universal mathematical language proposed by the young Leibniz was based. For von Wright the last Wittgenstein and the young Leibniz would have tried to legitimize the reciprocal semiotic understanding in the name of a previous experimental explanation, while for Apel both the last Wittgenstein and the young Leibniz would have tried to show the impossibility of explaining a fact of the experience if we do not have a previous language that allows us to understand it.&lt;/p&gt;</dct:description>
    <dct:accessRights rdf:resource="http://publications.europa.eu/resource/authority/access-right/PUBLIC"/>
    <dct:accessRights>
      <dct:RightsStatement rdf:about="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">
        <rdfs:label>Open Access</rdfs:label>
      </dct:RightsStatement>
    </dct:accessRights>
    <dct:license rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode"/>
    <dcat:distribution>
      <dcat:Distribution>
        <dcat:accessURL rdf:resource="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4625153">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4625153</dcat:accessURL>
        <dcat:byteSize>551500</dcat:byteSize>
        <dcat:downloadURL rdf:resource="https://zenodo.org/record/4625153/files/2020Ortiz.pdf">https://zenodo.org/record/4625153/files/2020Ortiz.pdf</dcat:downloadURL>
        <dcat:mediaType>application/pdf</dcat:mediaType>
      </dcat:Distribution>
    </dcat:distribution>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
479
171
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 479431
Downloads 171139
Data volume 94.3 MB76.7 MB
Unique views 343299
Unique downloads 167137

Share

Cite as