4573241
doi
10.5281/zenodo.4573241
oai:zenodo.org:4573241
user-cdsp
Palat Blazej
Sciences Po - CNRS
We're only in it for the money: are incentives enough to compensate poor motivation?
Brunel Valentin
Sciences Po - CNRS
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
<p>There are moments in online panel operation when technical, financial, or<br>
organisational constraints impose a change in panel functioning rules, resulting in increased<br>
risk of attrition. On the occasion of panel functioning change in ELIPSS, a French non-<br>
commercial online panel, we explored information predictive of panel survival when<br>
membership became less attractive to panellists. Available information was collected at<br>
different stages of individual participation: recruitment, profiling, and survey response<br>
behavior (paradata). We also devised an experiment aimed at testing differences in<br>
effectiveness between three types of incentives on panel survival: repetitive financial<br>
incentives (two incentives separated by a four-month period), single financial incentive, and<br>
single financial incentive coupled with a gift. A hierarchical logistic regression model made it<br>
possible to distinguish indices derived from survey response behavior and from questions<br>
pertaining to panellists’ initial motivation to join the panel as significant predictors of panel<br>
survival. Our findings can be useful for panel monitoring in the context of important changes<br>
in its functioning. They outline that long-lasting attitudes towards panel participation have<br>
much more impact on panel survival than the amount of incentives received.</p>
Zenodo
2021-03-02
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
4573240
user-cdsp
1614731236.993913
305560
md5:777a91363c055759f14ed2a6ce3773ad
https://zenodo.org/records/4573241/files/Brunel & Palat 2020.pdf
public
10.5281/zenodo.4573240
isVersionOf
doi