Presentation Open Access

We're only in it for the money: are incentives enough to compensate poor motivation?

Brunel Valentin; Palat Blazej

MARC21 XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="">
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210303002716.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="001">4573241</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Sciences Po - CNRS</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Palat Blazej</subfield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">305560</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">md5:777a91363c055759f14ed2a6ce3773ad</subfield>
    <subfield code="u"> &amp; Palat 2020.pdf</subfield>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">open</subfield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2021-03-02</subfield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="p">openaire</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">user-cdsp</subfield>
    <subfield code="o"></subfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Sciences Po - CNRS</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Brunel Valentin</subfield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">We're only in it for the money: are incentives enough to compensate poor motivation?</subfield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">user-cdsp</subfield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u"></subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</subfield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
    <subfield code="2"></subfield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">&lt;p&gt;There are moments in online panel operation when technical, financial, or&lt;br&gt;
organisational constraints impose a change in panel functioning rules, resulting in increased&lt;br&gt;
risk of attrition. On the occasion of panel functioning change in ELIPSS, a French non-&lt;br&gt;
commercial online panel, we explored information predictive of panel survival when&lt;br&gt;
membership became less attractive to panellists. Available information was collected at&lt;br&gt;
different stages of individual participation: recruitment, profiling, and survey response&lt;br&gt;
behavior (paradata). We also devised an experiment aimed at testing differences in&lt;br&gt;
effectiveness between three types of incentives on panel survival: repetitive financial&lt;br&gt;
incentives (two incentives separated by a four-month period), single financial incentive, and&lt;br&gt;
single financial incentive coupled with a gift. A hierarchical logistic regression model made it&lt;br&gt;
possible to distinguish indices derived from survey response behavior and from questions&lt;br&gt;
pertaining to panellists&amp;rsquo; initial motivation to join the panel as significant predictors of panel&lt;br&gt;
survival. Our findings can be useful for panel monitoring in the context of important changes&lt;br&gt;
in its functioning. They outline that long-lasting attitudes towards panel participation have&lt;br&gt;
much more impact on panel survival than the amount of incentives received.&lt;/p&gt;</subfield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="n">doi</subfield>
    <subfield code="i">isVersionOf</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.4573240</subfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.4573241</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">presentation</subfield>
All versions This version
Views 1818
Downloads 1616
Data volume 4.9 MB4.9 MB
Unique views 1616
Unique downloads 1414


Cite as