Report Open Access

OA Diamond Journals Study. Part 1: Findings

Bosman, Jeroen; Frantsvåg, Jan Erik; Kramer, Bianca; Langlais, Pierre-Carl; Proudman, Vanessa

Dublin Core Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="" xmlns:oai_dc="" xmlns:xsi="" xsi:schemaLocation="">
  <dc:contributor>Becerril, Arianna</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Bjørnshauge, Lars</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Mounier, Pierre</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Redhead, Claire</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Torny, Didier</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Bosman, Jeroen</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Frantsvåg, Jan Erik</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Kramer, Bianca</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Langlais, Pierre-Carl</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Proudman, Vanessa</dc:creator>
From June 2020 to February 2021, a consortium of 10 organisations undertook a large-scale study on open access journals across the world that are free for readers and authors, usually referred to as “OA diamond journals”. This study was commissioned by cOAlition S in order to gain a better understanding of the OA diamond landscape.

The study undertook a statistical analysis of several bibliographic databases, surveyed 1,619 journals, collected 7,019 free text submissions and other data from 94 questions, and organised three focus groups with 11 journals and 10 interviews with hosting platforms. It collected 163 references in the academic literature, and inventoried 1048 journals not listed in DOAJ.

The results of the study are available in the following outputs:

	Findings Report - DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4558704
	Recommendations Report- DOI:10.5281/zenodo.4562790
	References Library - DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4562816
	Journals Inventory - DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4562828
	Dataset - DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4553103


	A wide archipelago of relatively small journals serving diverse communities
	OA diamond journals are on the road to full compliance with Plan S
	A mix of scientific strengths and operational challenges
	An economy that largely depends on volunteers, universities and government
  <dc:description>This report was supported by Science Europe and cOAlition S</dc:description>
  <dc:subject>open science</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>open access</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>scholarly communication</dc:subject>
  <dc:title>OA Diamond Journals Study. Part 1: Findings</dc:title>
All versions This version
Views 19,18119,176
Downloads 11,33411,334
Data volume 96.1 GB96.1 GB
Unique views 16,27816,273
Unique downloads 9,9639,963


Cite as