% 0:29:53

P1: It’s important to make clear that the last two 0.01have no relationship. Because they
    might have no relationship and someone comes along and says ‘Look, it says 0.01’ (!!...!!)

P3: Which last two?

P1: The last two in lines 31 and 32, for example. Assuming the two numbers would have no
    relation and someone who only sees the implementation with raw numbers thinks ‘Oh,
    there is a relation, I’ll introduce a constant’. And then another comes along and introduces
    it everywhere. Now all have the same relation. Now you know that they should explicitly
    be converted this way.

P3: If it’s the same relation, you can treat them as such. You adapt it the moment it changes.

P1: Yes, but the one seeing the code doesn’t know when you have only raw numbers, with
    the same values. What about 3660?

P3: When did we ever have 3660 as a percentage?

P1: Or 3600! With 3600 it’s an example. That’s the conversion from hours to minutes, but
    also from seconds to minutes. Depending on the context two identical number can mean
    two completely different things.

P3: But applied to our case this has no relevance.

P1: Yes, it has. Because it is a Magic Number, and Magic Number means (!!...!!)

P3: But it is no longer ‘magic’. We just named it.

P1: <annoyed> Yes, we named it because it now creates a relation between these individual
    numbers. Before, it was not clear (!!...!!)

P3: I don’t understand what you want, right now.

P1: I wanted to explain why we are doing this (!!...!!)

P3: <annoyed> I got that.

P1: Good. It’s alright then.

P3: <nervous laughter> I tried to understand what you still wanted to change.

P1: Nothing. I didn’t want to change anything.

P3: <relieved> Ok.

P1: I only want to clarify that it’s important to (!!...!!)

P3: <annoyed> Got it.

P1: make the relation with this renaming.

P3: <annoyed> <*stares at screen*> So.

P1: Not only to rename the variable.

P3: <annoyed> It’s ok.

% 0:31:37