Caution: Unverified Contents

Papers are not peer-reviewed by Zenodo, and must be regarded as preliminary until peer-reviewed by multiple experts in the field. Thus it should not be regarded as conclusive, or be reported in news media as established information, as the main claims may not stand the test of scientific scrutiny.

There is a newer version of this record available.

Working paper Open Access

A Bayesian analysis concludes beyond a reasonable doubt that SARS-CoV-2 is not a natural zoonosis but instead is laboratory derived

Quay MD PhD, Steven Carl


JSON-LD (schema.org) Export

{
  "description": "<p>A Bayesian analysis concludes beyond a reasonable doubt that SARS-CoV-2&nbsp;is not a natural zoonosis but instead is laboratory derived.</p>", 
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode", 
  "creator": [
    {
      "affiliation": "Atossa Therapeutics, Inc.", 
      "@id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0363-7651", 
      "@type": "Person", 
      "name": "Quay MD PhD, Steven Carl"
    }
  ], 
  "headline": "A Bayesian analysis concludes beyond a reasonable doubt that SARS-CoV-2  is not a natural zoonosis but instead is laboratory derived", 
  "image": "https://zenodo.org/static/img/logos/zenodo-gradient-round.svg", 
  "datePublished": "2021-01-29", 
  "url": "https://zenodo.org/record/4477081", 
  "version": "2", 
  "keywords": [
    "SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus COVID-19 origin Bayesian analysis laboratory-acquired infection zoonosis"
  ], 
  "@context": "https://schema.org/", 
  "identifier": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4477081", 
  "@id": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4477081", 
  "@type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
  "name": "A Bayesian analysis concludes beyond a reasonable doubt that SARS-CoV-2  is not a natural zoonosis but instead is laboratory derived"
}
177,157
128,354
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 177,157144,640
Downloads 128,354107,085
Data volume 1.8 TB1.6 TB
Unique views 143,624119,450
Unique downloads 107,11190,298

Share

Cite as