Journal article Open Access

External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.

Borger, Pieter; Malhotra, Rajesh Kumar; Yeadon, Michael; Craig, Clare; McKernan, Kevin; Steger, Klaus; McSheehy, Paul; Angelova, Lidiya; Franchi, Fabio; Binder, Thomas; Ullrich, Henrik; Ohashi, Makoto; Scoglio, Stefano; Doesburg-van Kleffens, Marjolein; Gilbert, Dorothea; Klement, Rainer Johannes; Schrüfer, Ruth; Pieksma, Berber W.; Bonte, Jan; Dalle Carbonare, Bruno H.; Corbett, Kevin P.; Kämmer, Ulrike


MARC21 XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <leader>00000nam##2200000uu#4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">COVID-19</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">qRT-PCR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">SARS-CoV-2</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20201201121458.0</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">More information on this paper can be found here: https://cormandrostenreview.com/</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="001">4298004</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Department for Digital Arts, University for Applied Arts, Vienna, Austria</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Malhotra, Rajesh Kumar</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Yeadon Consulting Ltd., United Kingdom</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Yeadon, Michael</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">FRCPAth, United Kingdom</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Craig, Clare</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Medicinal Genomics, USA</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">McKernan, Kevin</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Department of Urology and Andrology, Biomedial Research Center of the Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Steger, Klaus</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Biochemist &amp; Industry Pharmacologist, Loerrach, Germany</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">McSheehy, Paul</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Angelova, Lidiya</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Società Scientifica per il Principio di Precauzione (SSPP), Italy</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Franchi, Fabio</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Kardiologie FMH, Wettingen, Switzerland</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Binder, Thomas</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Center for Radiology of Collm Hospital Oschatz, Germany</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Ullrich, Henrik</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Tokushima University, Japan</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Ohashi, Makoto</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Researcher (microbiologist, nutritionist), Italy</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Scoglio, Stefano</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Maasziekenhuis Pantein, Beugen, The Netherlands</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Doesburg-van Kleffens, Marjolein</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">DGI Consulting Services, Oslo, Norway</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Gilbert, Dorothea</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Department of Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital Schweinfurt, Germany</subfield>
    <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-1401-4270</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Klement, Rainer Johannes</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Researcher (human genetics, immunology), Munich, Germany</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Schrüfer, Ruth</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">General practitioner, The Netherlands</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Pieksma, Berber W.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Consultant Neurologist, The Netherlands</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Bonte, Jan</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">BDC Basel, Switzerland</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Dalle Carbonare, Bruno H.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Researcher, London, United Kingdom</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Corbett, Kevin P.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">University Hospital of Würzburg, Germany</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Kämmer, Ulrike</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">1636417</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">md5:20b289e1a7f085ad51d50a5b11cc39e1</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">https://zenodo.org/record/4298004/files/Review Corman_Drosten_Paper_Final_Version_10-3-Public_final.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">open</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2020-11-30</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="p">openaire</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">user-covid-19</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">oai:zenodo.org:4298004</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">W+W, Lörrach, Germany</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Borger, Pieter</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">user-covid-19</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">opendefinition.org</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">&lt;p&gt;In the publication entitled &amp;ldquo;Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR&amp;rdquo; (Eurosurveillance 25(8) 2020) the authors present a diagnostic workflow and RT-qPCR protocol for detection and diagnostics of 2019-nCoV (now known as SARS-CoV-2), which they claim to be validated, as well as being a robust diagnostic methodology for use in public-health laboratory settings.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In light of all the consequences resulting from this very publication for societies worldwide, a group of independent researchers performed a point-by-point review of the aforesaid publication in which 1) all components of the presented test design were cross checked, 2) the RT-qPCR protocol-recommendations were assesses w.r.t. good laboratory practice, and 3) parameters examined against relevant scientific literature covering the field.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The published RT-qPCR protocol for detection and diagnostics of 2019-nCoV and the manuscript suffer from numerous technical and scientific errors, including insufficient primer design, a problematic and insufficient RT-qPCR protocol, and the absence of an accurate test validation. Neither the presented test nor the manuscript itself fulfils the requirements for an acceptable scientific publication. Further, serious conflicts of interest of the authors are not mentioned. Finally, the very short timescale between submission and acceptance of the publication (24 hours) signifies that a systematic peer review process was either not performed here, or of problematic poor quality.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;We provide compelling evidence of several scientific inadequacies, errors and flaws.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Considering the scientific and methodological blemishes presented here, we are confident that the editorial board of Eurosurveillance has no other choice but to retract the publication.&lt;/p&gt;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="n">doi</subfield>
    <subfield code="i">isVersionOf</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.4298003</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.4298004</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">publication</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">article</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
9,873
6,402
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 9,8739,873
Downloads 6,4026,402
Data volume 10.5 GB10.5 GB
Unique views 8,7258,725
Unique downloads 5,8915,891

Share

Cite as