Conference paper Open Access
{ "files": [ { "links": { "self": "https://zenodo.org/api/files/fa22fb24-057c-4316-89a0-65cdaac7ab01/GBU_article.pdf" }, "checksum": "md5:bc10c015f1ef0112d99e47afa25e0cf2", "bucket": "fa22fb24-057c-4316-89a0-65cdaac7ab01", "key": "GBU_article.pdf", "type": "pdf", "size": 936331 } ], "owners": [ 123286 ], "doi": "10.5281/zenodo.4293257", "stats": { "version_unique_downloads": 915.0, "unique_views": 1628.0, "views": 1734.0, "version_views": 2565.0, "unique_downloads": 845.0, "version_unique_views": 2358.0, "volume": 874533154.0, "version_downloads": 1100.0, "downloads": 934.0, "version_volume": 1365696744.0 }, "links": { "doi": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4293257", "conceptdoi": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4293256", "bucket": "https://zenodo.org/api/files/fa22fb24-057c-4316-89a0-65cdaac7ab01", "conceptbadge": "https://zenodo.org/badge/doi/10.5281/zenodo.4293256.svg", "html": "https://zenodo.org/record/4293257", "latest_html": "https://zenodo.org/record/5091301", "badge": "https://zenodo.org/badge/doi/10.5281/zenodo.4293257.svg", "latest": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/5091301" }, "conceptdoi": "10.5281/zenodo.4293256", "created": "2020-11-27T07:31:25.493207+00:00", "updated": "2021-07-12T06:37:17.804904+00:00", "conceptrecid": "4293256", "revision": 7, "id": 4293257, "metadata": { "access_right_category": "success", "doi": "10.5281/zenodo.4293257", "description": "<p>In 2003–04, in the wake of the SARS epidemics, there were multiple cases of laboratory acquired infection (LAI) with SARS in just a few months: first in a P3 in Singapore, then in a military P4 in Taipei and last a protracted case in a P3 in Beijing.</p>\n\n<p>This article reviews some of these cases and discusses briefly some of the insights that were gained from these at the time.</p>\n\n<p>Without exaggeration, the Beijing LAI accident seems very much to be a story of towering academic ego, shocking incompetence, obstruction of the truth and lack of accountability. More importantly the unchallenged poor-handling of the investigation by the Chinese authorities may have set a bad precedent.</p>", "license": { "id": "CC-BY-4.0" }, "title": "The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: a review of SARS Lab Escapes", "relations": { "version": [ { "count": 3, "index": 0, "parent": { "pid_type": "recid", "pid_value": "4293256" }, "is_last": false, "last_child": { "pid_type": "recid", "pid_value": "5091301" } } ] }, "communities": [ { "id": "covid-19" } ], "version": "1.0", "keywords": [ "SARS", "LAI", "Laboratory Escape", "Covid-19", "Investigation", "WHO" ], "publication_date": "2020-11-27", "creators": [ { "orcid": "0000-0001-7277-9533", "affiliation": "BNZ", "name": "Demaneuf, Gilles" } ], "access_right": "open", "resource_type": { "subtype": "conferencepaper", "type": "publication", "title": "Conference paper" }, "related_identifiers": [ { "scheme": "doi", "identifier": "10.5281/zenodo.4293256", "relation": "isVersionOf" } ] } }
All versions | This version | |
---|---|---|
Views | 2,565 | 1,734 |
Downloads | 1,100 | 934 |
Data volume | 1.4 GB | 874.5 MB |
Unique views | 2,358 | 1,628 |
Unique downloads | 915 | 845 |