Journal article Open Access

Doctoral student reflections of blended learning before and during covid-19

Bradley D. F. Colpitts; Brandy L. Usick; Sarah Elaine Eaton


Dublin Core Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Bradley D. F. Colpitts</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Brandy L. Usick</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Sarah Elaine Eaton</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2020-10-30</dc:date>
  <dc:description>Purpose: Οur study aimed to address the central research question: how were our experiences as graduate students in a blended learning professional doctoral program changed by the COVID-19 crisis? The study adds to a growing body of literature on blended learning graduate programs.

Methods: We employed action research as our central methodology and leveraged narrative inquiry to elevate our (students’) voices. The two participant-researchers responded to a series of questions supported by narrative reflections from their common academic supervisor. Emergent themes were identified in the data using narrative analysis techniques for coding qualitative data into themes. This was followed by a second phase of data collection and analysis after the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results: Τhe researchers identified four themes within the data: 1. balancing doctoral work with professional and personal responsibilities; 2. cohort provides formal and informal support; 3. individuality of the experience; and 4. supervisory group support.

Implications: Οur study offers a number of key learnings that may benefit researchers studying blended learning programs. The key learnings suggest benefits to cohort-based, blended learning programs, as well as difficulties that may emerge in the individuality of the experience, when encountering crises, as well as more generally.</dc:description>
  <dc:description>SUBMITTED: MAY 2020, REVISION SUBMITTED: AUGUST 2020, 2nd REVISION SUBMITTED: SEPTEMBER 2020, ACCEPTED: OCTOBER 2020, REFEREED ANONYMOUSLY, PUBLISHED ONLINE: 30 OCTOBER 2020</dc:description>
  <dc:identifier>https://zenodo.org/record/4247601</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>10.5281/zenodo.4247601</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>oai:zenodo.org:4247601</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>issn:2654-0274</dc:relation>
  <dc:relation>doi:10.5281/zenodo.4247600</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Journal of Contemporary Education Theory &amp; Research 4(2) 3-11</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>blended learning</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>COVID-19</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>graduate education</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>online education</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>student experience</dc:subject>
  <dc:title>Doctoral student reflections of blended learning before and during covid-19</dc:title>
  <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
  <dc:type>publication-article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
32
15
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 3232
Downloads 1515
Data volume 11.9 MB11.9 MB
Unique views 2929
Unique downloads 1414

Share

Cite as