Conference paper Open Access

Knowing When to Ask: Sound scheduling of name resolution in type checkers derived from declarative specifications (Extended Version)

Rouvoet, Arjen; van Antwerpen, Hendrik; Bach Poulsen, Casper; Krebbers, Robbert; Visser, Eelco


DataCite XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd">
  <identifier identifierType="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4091445</identifier>
  <creators>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Rouvoet, Arjen</creatorName>
      <givenName>Arjen</givenName>
      <familyName>Rouvoet</familyName>
      <affiliation>Delft University of Technology</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>van Antwerpen, Hendrik</creatorName>
      <givenName>Hendrik</givenName>
      <familyName>van Antwerpen</familyName>
      <affiliation>Delft University of Technology</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Bach Poulsen, Casper</creatorName>
      <givenName>Casper</givenName>
      <familyName>Bach Poulsen</familyName>
      <affiliation>Delft University of Technology</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Krebbers, Robbert</creatorName>
      <givenName>Robbert</givenName>
      <familyName>Krebbers</familyName>
      <affiliation>Radboud University and Delft University of Technology</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Visser, Eelco</creatorName>
      <givenName>Eelco</givenName>
      <familyName>Visser</familyName>
      <affiliation>Delft University of Technology</affiliation>
    </creator>
  </creators>
  <titles>
    <title>Knowing When to Ask: Sound scheduling of name resolution in type checkers derived from declarative specifications (Extended Version)</title>
  </titles>
  <publisher>Zenodo</publisher>
  <publicationYear>2020</publicationYear>
  <subjects>
    <subject>Statix, Constraint and Logic Programming, Type Systems, Specification</subject>
  </subjects>
  <dates>
    <date dateType="Issued">2020-10-15</date>
  </dates>
  <language>en</language>
  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">Conference paper</resourceType>
  <alternateIdentifiers>
    <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://zenodo.org/record/4091445</alternateIdentifier>
  </alternateIdentifiers>
  <relatedIdentifiers>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsSupplementTo" resourceTypeGeneral="Text">10.1145/3428248</relatedIdentifier>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsVersionOf">10.5281/zenodo.4091444</relatedIdentifier>
  </relatedIdentifiers>
  <version>1.0.0</version>
  <rightsList>
    <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</rights>
    <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights>
  </rightsList>
  <descriptions>
    <description descriptionType="Abstract">&lt;p&gt;Extended version of the OOPSLA &amp;#39;20 paper &amp;quot;Knowing When to Ask&amp;quot;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Abstract:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
There is a large gap between the specification of type systems and the implementation of their type checkers, which impedes reasoning about the soundness of the type checker with respect to the specification. A vision to close this gap is to automatically obtain type checkers from declarative programming language specifications. This moves the burden of proving correctness from a case-by-case basis for concrete languages to a single correctness proof for the specification language. This vision is obstructed by an aspect common to all programming languages: name resolution. Naming and scoping are pervasive and complex aspects of the static semantics of programming languages. Implementations of type checkers for languages with name binding features such as modules, imports, classes, and inheritance interleave collection of binding information (i.e., declarations, scoping structure, and imports) and querying that information. This requires scheduling those two aspects in such a way that query answers are stable---i.e., they are computed only after all relevant binding structure has been collected. Type checkers for concrete languages accomplish stability using language-specific knowledge about the type system.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In this paper we give a language-independent characterization of necessary and sufficient conditions to guarantee&lt;br&gt;
stability of name and type queries during type checking in terms of &lt;em&gt;critical edges in an incomplete scope graph&lt;/em&gt;. We use critical edges to give a formal small-step operational semantics to a declarative specification language for type systems, that achieves soundness by delaying queries that may depend on missing information. This yields type checkers for the specified languages that are sound by construction---i.e., they schedule queries so that the answers are stable, and only accept programs that are name- and type-correct according to the declarative language specification. We implement this approach, and evaluate it against specifications of a small module and record language, as well as subsets of Java and Scala.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  </descriptions>
</resource>
66
49
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 6666
Downloads 4949
Data volume 39.5 MB39.5 MB
Unique views 5252
Unique downloads 3939

Share

Cite as