Journal article Open Access

EU STATE AID LAW AS A PASSEPARTOUT: SHOULDN'T WE STOP TAKING THE EFFECT ON TRADE FOR GRANTED?

Bernardo Cortese


JSON-LD (schema.org) Export

{
  "description": "<p>The present contribution addresses the excessive amount of discretion left to the EU Commission (and Courts) in defining the enforcement priorities in the field of EU State aid Law, by singling out one element of the (inherently vague) the notion of State aid, namely the effect on trade between member States. The approach taken by the Commission&rsquo;s practice and the ECJ case law in this field ends up building a rather unpredictable legal framework. This risks unreasonably undermining both member States&rsquo; legislative choices in fields not necessarily falling under an EU competence, and undertakings&rsquo; legitimate expectations.</p>", 
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode", 
  "creator": [
    {
      "affiliation": "Universit\u00e0 degli studi di Padova", 
      "@type": "Person", 
      "name": "Bernardo Cortese"
    }
  ], 
  "headline": "EU STATE AID LAW AS A PASSEPARTOUT: SHOULDN'T WE STOP TAKING THE EFFECT ON TRADE FOR GRANTED?", 
  "image": "https://zenodo.org/static/img/logos/zenodo-gradient-round.svg", 
  "datePublished": "2020-08-31", 
  "url": "https://zenodo.org/record/4085232", 
  "keywords": [
    "EU Law, EU Competition Law, EU State Aid Law, EU Internal Market, Notion of State Aid, EU Commission, Self-Restraint"
  ], 
  "@context": "https://schema.org/", 
  "identifier": "https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2020.4.1.194", 
  "@id": "https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2020.4.1.194", 
  "@type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
  "name": "EU STATE AID LAW AS A PASSEPARTOUT: SHOULDN'T WE STOP TAKING THE EFFECT ON TRADE FOR GRANTED?"
}