10.5281/zenodo.4080867
https://zenodo.org/records/4080867
oai:zenodo.org:4080867
Taco de Bruin
Taco de Bruin
0000-0001-9149-2095
NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research
Sarah Coombs
Sarah Coombs
0000-0002-4233-7133
Saxion Hogeschool
Jutta de Jong
Jutta de Jong
0000-0002-5066-5970
Erasmus University
Irene Haslinger
Irene Haslinger
0000-0003-3927-6445
TU Delft
Henk van den Hoogen
Henk van den Hoogen
0000-0002-7257-3209
Maastricht University
Frans Huigen
Frans Huigen
0000-0002-9482-7679
Data Archiving and Networked Service (DANS)
Mijke Jetten
Mijke Jetten
0000-0001-9114-2896
Dutch Techcentre for Life Sciences
Jacko Koster
Jacko Koster
0000-0003-1079-4927
University Leiden
Margriet Miedema
Margriet Miedema
0000-0002-4664-9492
Landelijk Coordinatiepunt RDM
Sjef Öllers
Sjef Öllers
0000-0002-9219-5874
TU Eindhoven
Inge Slouwerhof
Inge Slouwerhof
0000-0002-6012-5070
Radboud University
Ingeborg Verheul
Ingeborg Verheul
0000-0003-4093-3190
University of Amsterdam
Jacquelijn Ringersma
Jacquelijn Ringersma
0000-0001-7465-9172
Wageningen University & Research
Do I-PASS for FAIR. A self assessment tool to measure the FAIR-ness of an organization
Zenodo
2020
Organization
Self-assessment-tool
FAIR
2020-11-03
eng
10.5281/zenodo.4080866
https://zenodo.org/communities/lcrdm-output-and-products
1
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
The 15 FAIR data principles are intended to be applied to a dataset, but the acronym FAIR is also used as an adjective for other (digital) matters, such as FAIR data stewardship, FAIR data infrastructure and FAIR data services. Moreover, in the context of Open Science and scientific integrity, more and more Dutch universities and research organizations discuss a FAIR organization as an important goal, thus implementing RDM practices and support with the FAIR principles as a main driver.
Triggered by this use of the acronym FAIR for organizations, an LCRDM (National Coordination Point Research Data Management) task group explored the definition, characteristics and principles of a so-called ‘FAIR enabling organization’. The task group delivered two products: (1) a definition for a FAIR enabling organization and (2) a self-assessment tool to evaluate the FAIR-ness of a research organization (research institute, university or university of applied sciences).
This self-assessment tool is a simple instrument, presented in an editable PDF form. By answering the questions and evaluating the level (beginner, intermediate, or advanced) at which you assess the performance of your organization, you will be able to define the actual FAIR-ness. In addition you can define a Road Map to become a FAIR Enabling Research Organization using the information in de more advances level(s).