Project deliverable Open Access

SIENNA D3.5: Public views of human enhancement technologies in 11 EU and non-EU countries

Marie Prudhomme


JSON-LD (schema.org) Export

{
  "inLanguage": {
    "alternateName": "eng", 
    "@type": "Language", 
    "name": "English"
  }, 
  "description": "<p>Based on a telephone survey of 1,000 people in each of 11 countries (<em>EU</em>:&nbsp;France, Germany, Greece, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Sweden;&nbsp;<em>non-EU</em>: Brazil, South Africa, South Korea, USA), this report provides a snapshot of opinions in 2019 on human enhancement technologies and their impact on society.&nbsp;The&nbsp;report&nbsp;looks at&nbsp;overall&nbsp;feelings&nbsp;towards&nbsp;human&nbsp;enhancement&nbsp;technology&nbsp;as&nbsp;well&nbsp;as&nbsp;at&nbsp;four specific areas: technology to make people live to 120 years old; technology to make people more intelligent, technology to allow a person to choose a particular emotion; and technology to improve people&rsquo;s&nbsp;moral&nbsp;values.&nbsp;It&nbsp;displays&nbsp;self-reported&nbsp;support&nbsp;and opposition&nbsp;levels&nbsp;for&nbsp;the&nbsp;technology&nbsp;areas, perceptions of who they ought to be available to, as well as perceptions on whether they should be permanent or reversible. The report also looks at perceived responsibility for ensuring the safety of human enhancement technology, as well as perceptions of specific societal&nbsp;impact.</p>\n\n<p>It&nbsp;should&nbsp;be&nbsp;noted&nbsp;that&nbsp;human&nbsp;enhancement&nbsp;technology&nbsp;is&nbsp;a&nbsp;complex&nbsp;topic,&nbsp;and&nbsp;that&nbsp;despite&nbsp;cognitive testing and a pilot we cannot fully assess how the terminologies were interpreted by respondents. Therefore, results should be treated as indicative of individuals&rsquo; perceptions of the topic&nbsp;areas.</p>", 
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode", 
  "creator": [
    {
      "affiliation": "Kantar (Public Division)", 
      "@type": "Person", 
      "name": "Marie Prudhomme"
    }
  ], 
  "url": "https://zenodo.org/record/4068194", 
  "datePublished": "2020-09-25", 
  "keywords": [
    "human enhancement technology", 
    "physical enhancement technology", 
    "cognitive enhancement technology", 
    "emotional enhancement technology,", 
    "longevity enhancement technology,", 
    "emerging technology", 
    "ethics", 
    "policy", 
    "quantitative survey", 
    "public opinion"
  ], 
  "version": "V4", 
  "contributor": [
    {
      "affiliation": "University of Twente, RWTH Aachen", 
      "@type": "Person", 
      "name": "Saskia Nagel"
    }, 
    {
      "affiliation": "University of Twente", 
      "@type": "Person", 
      "name": "Sean Jensen"
    }, 
    {
      "affiliation": "Kantar (Public Division)", 
      "@type": "Person", 
      "name": "Tim Hanson"
    }, 
    {
      "affiliation": "Kantar (Public Division)", 
      "@type": "Person", 
      "name": "Oliver Greene"
    }, 
    {
      "affiliation": "Kantar (Public Division)", 
      "@type": "Person", 
      "name": "George Spedding"
    }
  ], 
  "@context": "https://schema.org/", 
  "identifier": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4068194", 
  "@id": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4068194", 
  "@type": "CreativeWork", 
  "name": "SIENNA D3.5: Public views of human enhancement technologies in 11 EU and non-EU countries"
}
345
228
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 345345
Downloads 228228
Data volume 348.8 MB348.8 MB
Unique views 296296
Unique downloads 208208

Share

Cite as