Journal article Open Access

Facultative associations of two sympatric lycaenid butterflies with Camponotus compressus – field study and larval surface ultrastructure

Priya Aradhya Ekka; Sudha Kumari; Neelkamal Rastogi


Citation Style Language JSON Export

{
  "publisher": "Zenodo", 
  "DOI": "10.5281/zenodo.4043261", 
  "container_title": "Halteres", 
  "title": "Facultative associations of two sympatric lycaenid butterflies with Camponotus compressus \u2013 field study and larval surface ultrastructure", 
  "issued": {
    "date-parts": [
      [
        2020, 
        9, 
        28
      ]
    ]
  }, 
  "abstract": "<p><strong>The present study focused on the associations of two sympatric lycaenid species, <em>Chilades pandava</em> Horsfield, 1829 and <em>Euchrysops cnejus </em>Fabricius, 1798 with their respective host plants and the lycaenid tending <em>Camponotus compressus</em> Fabricius, 1787 ants by conduction of field studies and by examination of the ultrastructure of the larval myrmecophilous organs. The study revealed two facultative association complexes: ants - the defoliating <em>Cl. pandava</em> larvae - <em>Cycas revoluta</em> (Thunb.) plants and ants - the pod-boring <em>E. cnejus</em> larvae - cowpea plant, <em>Vigna unguiculata</em> (L.) Walp. The association of <em>Cl. pandava</em> was strongly synchronized with its host plant phenology and relatively less strongly with its late-arriving ant partner since the young, curled up leaves provided resources only to the caterpillars. The provision of resources to both the ants and the lycaenids by the cowpea plants contributed to the synchronization of <em>E. cnejus </em>association with the early arriving ants as well as the host plant<em>. </em>Presence of a single type of setae in <em>Cl. pandava </em>and of two types of setae in <em>E. cnejus</em> larvae indicates their facultative adaptations for resisting attack by their host ants. Ultrastructural similarity in the dorsal nectary, pore cupola and tentacle organs suggest that the basic myrmecophilous organs are conserved in these two lycaenid species.</strong></p>", 
  "author": [
    {
      "family": "Priya Aradhya Ekka"
    }, 
    {
      "family": "Sudha Kumari"
    }, 
    {
      "family": "Neelkamal Rastogi"
    }
  ], 
  "page": "44-55", 
  "volume": "11", 
  "type": "article-journal", 
  "id": "4043261"
}
428
89
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 428428
Downloads 8989
Data volume 66.0 MB66.0 MB
Unique views 308308
Unique downloads 7878

Share

Cite as