Journal article Open Access
von Cossel, M.;
Iqbal, Y.;
Lewandowski, I.
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?> <record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"> <leader>00000nam##2200000uu#4500</leader> <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">eng</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">Bioeconomy</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">biodiversity</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">bioenergy cropping system</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">biomass production</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">diversification</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">legume</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">perennial crop</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">wild plant</subfield> </datafield> <controlfield tag="005">20200916125930.0</controlfield> <controlfield tag="001">4032322</controlfield> <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-1253-204X</subfield> <subfield code="a">Iqbal, Y.</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-0388-4521</subfield> <subfield code="a">Lewandowski, I.</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" "> <subfield code="s">4856997</subfield> <subfield code="z">md5:1993bb1c7855310f8be15e8ccd8585fb</subfield> <subfield code="u">https://zenodo.org/record/4032322/files/agriculture-09-00194-v4.pdf</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="l">open</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="c">2019-09-19</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O"> <subfield code="p">openaire</subfield> <subfield code="p">user-h2020-magic</subfield> <subfield code="o">oai:zenodo.org:4032322</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="4"> <subfield code="c">194</subfield> <subfield code="n">9</subfield> <subfield code="p">Ariculture</subfield> <subfield code="v">2019</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-1132-3281</subfield> <subfield code="a">von Cossel, M.</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">Improving the Ecological Performance of Miscanthus (Miscanthus giantess Greef et Deuter) through intercropping with Woad (Isatis tinctorial L.) and Yellow Mellow (Melilotus ocinalis L.)</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">user-h2020-magic</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="536" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="c">727698</subfield> <subfield code="a">Marginal lands for Growing Industrial Crops: Turning a burden into an opportunity</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="u">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</subfield> <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7"> <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield> <subfield code="2">opendefinition.org</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a"><p>Miscanthus is a promising high-yielding and low-input perennial biomass crop. However, as miscanthus does not produce nectar, it provides less support for pollinators than&nbsp;other perennial biomass crops, such as cup plant, Virginia mallow, or wild plant mixtures. This study&nbsp;discusses whether miscanthus could be intercropped with flower-rich biennial wild plants to further&nbsp;enhance its ecological functioning. In 2017, a demonstration plot was established in southwest&nbsp;Germany with two miscanthus intercropping regimes: woad (WAM) and yellow melilot (YAM).&nbsp;Both woad and melilot reached full bloom in 2018, the second year of cultivation. The flowering period&nbsp;of woad started and ended earlier than that of melilot. Woad remained harvestable until spring 2019,&nbsp;whereas the aboveground melilot was destroyed by brown hare in autumn 2018. However, the shed&nbsp;seeds of melilot reemerged homogeneously in 2019. The miscanthus developed better in YAM than&nbsp;WAM. This was most likely due to (i) stronger competition for water, nutrients, and light inWAM and&nbsp;(ii) nitrogen fixation advantage in melilot. These results indicate that the ecological performance of&nbsp;miscanthus&nbsp;could be improved by intercropping with melilot. Thus, we propose to further investigate&nbsp;the effect of intercropping on both the productivity and quality of miscanthus biomass.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p></subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">10.3390/agriculture9090194</subfield> <subfield code="2">doi</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">publication</subfield> <subfield code="b">article</subfield> </datafield> </record>
Views | 82 |
Downloads | 51 |
Data volume | 247.7 MB |
Unique views | 63 |
Unique downloads | 50 |