Journal article Open Access
Michael Volgger; Harald Pechlaner; Sabine Pichler
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd"> <identifier identifierType="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.401371</identifier> <creators> <creator> <creatorName>Michael Volgger</creatorName> <affiliation>Curtin University, Australia</affiliation> </creator> <creator> <creatorName>Harald Pechlaner</creatorName> <affiliation>Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Germany</affiliation> </creator> <creator> <creatorName>Sabine Pichler</creatorName> <affiliation>Eurac Research, Italy</affiliation> </creator> </creators> <titles> <title>The practice of destination governance: A comparative analysis of key dimensions and underlying concepts</title> </titles> <publisher>Zenodo</publisher> <publicationYear>2017</publicationYear> <subjects> <subject>Destination governance</subject> <subject>destination management</subject> <subject>governance dimensions</subject> <subject>qualitative comparison</subject> <subject>GABEK</subject> </subjects> <dates> <date dateType="Issued">2017-03-27</date> </dates> <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">Journal article</resourceType> <alternateIdentifiers> <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://zenodo.org/record/401371</alternateIdentifier> </alternateIdentifiers> <relatedIdentifiers> <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="ISSN" relationType="IsPartOf">2529-1947</relatedIdentifier> </relatedIdentifiers> <rightsList> <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</rights> <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights> </rightsList> <descriptions> <description descriptionType="Abstract"><p><em>Most of research on destination governance focuses on reporting the results of single case studies, whose findings are often related to the particularities of the specific destinations considered. As a result, there is little (empirical) consistency in underlying principles and dimensions of destination governance. To overcome this gap, this paper presents a combined (re-)analysis of multiple qualitative case studies and empirically develops destination governance dimensions from a practitioner point of view. Findings show that theoretical conceptualisation of destination governance and practical foci differ in some respects: In contrast to governance theory, practitioners refer more to context, process and change.</em></p></description> <description descriptionType="Other">SUBMITTED: AUG 2016, REVISION SUBMITTED: DEC 2016, ACCEPTED: JAN 2017, REFEREED ANONYMOUSLY, PUBLISHED ONLINE: 27 MARCH 2017. JEL Classification: L83, M1, O1</description> <description descriptionType="Other">{"references": ["Hern\u00e1ndez, M.R., Talavera, A.S., & Parra L\u00f3pez, E. (2016). Effects of co-creation in a tourism destination brand image through twitter. Journal of Tourism, Heritage & Services Marketing, 2(2), 3\u201310. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.376341"]}</description> </descriptions> </resource>
All versions | This version | |
---|---|---|
Views | 89 | 89 |
Downloads | 53 | 53 |
Data volume | 25.4 MB | 25.4 MB |
Unique views | 84 | 84 |
Unique downloads | 51 | 51 |