March 27, 2017 Journal article Open Access

Michael Volgger; Harald Pechlaner; Sabine Pichler

DataCite XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd">
  <identifier identifierType="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.401371</identifier>
  <creators>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Michael Volgger</creatorName>
      <affiliation>Curtin University, Australia</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Harald Pechlaner</creatorName>
      <affiliation>Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Germany</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Sabine Pichler</creatorName>
      <affiliation>Eurac Research, Italy</affiliation>
    </creator>
  </creators>
  <titles>
    <title>The practice of destination governance: A comparative analysis of key dimensions and underlying concepts</title>
  </titles>
  <publisher>Zenodo</publisher>
  <publicationYear>2017</publicationYear>
  <subjects>
    <subject>Destination governance</subject>
    <subject>destination management</subject>
    <subject>governance dimensions</subject>
    <subject>qualitative comparison</subject>
    <subject>GABEK</subject>
  </subjects>
  <dates>
    <date dateType="Issued">2017-03-27</date>
  </dates>
  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="JournalArticle"/>
  <alternateIdentifiers>
    <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://zenodo.org/record/401371</alternateIdentifier>
  </alternateIdentifiers>
  <relatedIdentifiers>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="ISSN" relationType="IsPartOf">2529-1947</relatedIdentifier>
  </relatedIdentifiers>
  <rightsList>
    <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</rights>
    <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights>
  </rightsList>
  <descriptions>
    <description descriptionType="Abstract">&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Most of research on destination governance focuses on reporting the results of single case studies, whose findings are often related to the particularities of the specific destinations considered. As a result, there is little (empirical) consistency in underlying principles and dimensions of destination governance. To overcome this gap, this paper presents a combined (re-)analysis of multiple qualitative case studies and empirically develops destination governance dimensions from a practitioner point of view. Findings show that theoretical conceptualisation of destination governance and practical foci differ in some respects: In contrast to governance theory, practitioners refer more to context, process and change.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <description descriptionType="Other">SUBMITTED: AUG 2016, REVISION SUBMITTED: DEC 2016, ACCEPTED: JAN 2017, REFEREED ANONYMOUSLY, PUBLISHED ONLINE: 27 MARCH 2017. JEL Classification: L83, M1, O1</description>
    <description descriptionType="Other">{"references": ["Hern\u00e1ndez, M.R., Talavera, A.S., &amp; Parra L\u00f3pez, E. (2016). Effects of co-creation in a tourism destination brand image through twitter. Journal of Tourism, Heritage &amp; Services Marketing, 2(2), 3\u201310. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.376341"]}</description>
  </descriptions>
</resource>