Biodiversity Literature Repository
Published August 31, 2016 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Does nutritional status constrain adoption of more costly and less risky foraging behaviour in an Amazonian shelter-building spider?

Creators

  • 1. Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Conservação de Recursos Naturais, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil;
  • 2. Pós-doutorado pela Pós-graduação em Zoologia, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Feira de Santana, Brazil;
  • 3. Pós-doutorado pelo Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Alegre, Brazil

Description

Moura, R. R., Leal, L. C., Kloss, T. G. (2016): Does nutritional status constrain adoption of more costly and less risky foraging behaviour in an Amazonian shelter-building spider? Journal of Natural History 50: 2829-2837, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2016.1211768, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2016.1211768

Files

source.pdf

Files (869.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:161bb14f88c2975d546b5d585e08a6ed
869.7 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:161BB14FFFC2975D546B5D585E08FFED

Related works

Has part
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.3994707 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.3994709 (DOI)

References

  • Blackledge TA. 1998. Signal conflict in spider webs driven by predators and prey. Proc R Soc Lond B. 265:1991-1996.
  • Brechbuhl R, Casas J, Bacher S. 2011. Diet choice of a predator in the wild: overabundance of prey and missed opportunities along the prey capture sequence. Ecosphere. 2:1-15.
  • Brown JS. 1988. Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 22:37-47.
  • Danks HV. 2002. Modification of adverse conditions by insects. Oikos. 99:10-24.
  • Dill LM, Fraser AHG. 1997. The worm re-turns hiding behavior of a tube dwelling marine polychaete, Serpula vermicularis. Behav Ecol. 8:186-193.
  • Gauld ID, Dubois J. 2006. Phylogeny of the Polysphincta group of genera (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae; Pimplinae): a taxonomic revision of spider ectoparasitoids. Syst Entomol. 31:529-564.
  • Gillette R, Huang RC, Hatcher N, Moroz LL. 2000. Cost-benefit analysis potential in feeding behavior of a predatory snail by integration of hunger, taste, and pain. PNAS. 97:3585-3590.
  • Hingston RWG. 1932. A naturalist in the Guiana forest. London: Edward Arnold & Co.
  • Houston A, McNamara JM. 2014. Foraging currencies, metabolism and behavioural routines. J Anim Ecol. 83:30-40.
  • Jakob EM, Marshall SD, Uetz GW. 1996. Estimating fitness: a comparison of body condition indices. Oikos. 77:61-67.
  • Kinlaw A. 1999. A review of burrowing by semi-fossorial vertebrates in arid environments. J Arid Environ. 41:127-145.
  • Kotler BP. 1984. Risk of predation and the structure of desert rodent communities. Ecology. 65:689-701.
  • Kotler BP, Gross JE, Mitchell WA. 1994. Applying patch use to assess aspects of foraging behavior in Nubian ibex. J Wildl Manage. 58:299-307.
  • Laurance SGW, Laurance WF, Andrade A, Fearnside PM, Harms KE, Vicentini A, Luizao RCC. 2010. Influence of soils and topography on Amazonian tree diversity: a landscape-scale study. J Veg Sci. 21:96-106.
  • Laurance WF, Lovejoy TE, Vasconcelos HL, Bruna EM, Didham RK, Stouffer PC, Gascon C, Bierregaard RO, Laurance SG, Sampaio E. 2002. Ecosystem decay of Amazonian forest fragments: a 22-year investigation. Conserv Biol. 16:605-618.
  • Levi HW. 1995. Orb-weaving spiders Actinosoma, Spilasma, Micrepeira, Pronous, and four new genera (Araneae: Araneidae). Bull Mus Comp Zool. 154:153-213.
  • Lima SL, Dill LM. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool. 68:619-640.
  • Lima SL, Valone TJ, Caraco T. 1985. Foraging-efficiency-predation-risk trade-off in the grey squirrel. Anim Behav. 33:155-165.
  • MacArthur RH, Pianka ER. 1966. On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am Nat. 100:603-609.
  • Manicom C, Schwarzkopf L, Alford RA, Schoener TW. 2008. Self-made shelters protect spiders from predation. PNAS. 105:14903-14907.
  • McNamara JM, Barta Z, Houston AI, Race P. 2005. A theoretical investigation of the effect of predators on foraging behaviour and energy reserves. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci. 272:929-934.
  • Peakall DB, Witt PN. 1976. The energy budget of an orb web-building spider. Comp Biochem Physiol. 54:187-190.
  • Perry G, Pianka ER. 1997. Animal foraging: past, present and future. TREE. 12:360-364.
  • Pyke GH. 1984. Optimal foraging theory: a critical review. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 15:523-575.
  • R Development Core Team. 2015. R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  • Rito KF, Hanashiro FTT, Peixoto PEC, Gonzaga MO. 2016. Optimal foraging or predator avoidance: why do individuals of the Amazon spider Hingstepeira folisecens (Araneae: araneidae) adopt alternative foraging behaviors? Zoologia. 33:e20150147.
  • Rypstra AL. 1984. A relative measure of predation on web-spiders in temperate and tropical forests. Oikos. 43:129-132.
  • Scharf I, Lubin Y, Ovadia O. 2011. Foraging decisions and behavioural flexibility in trap-building predators: a review. Biol Rev. 86:626-639.
  • Strobbe F, McPeek MA, De Block M, Stoks R. 2011. Fish predation selects for reduced foraging activity. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 65:241-247.
  • Tanaka K. 1989. Energetic cost of web construction and its effect on web relocation in the webbuilding spider Agelena limbata. Oecologia. 81:459-464.
  • Tietjen WJ, Rao Ayyagari L, Uetz GW. 1987. Symbiosis between social spiders and yeast: the role in prey attraction. Psyche. 94:151-158.
  • Uetz GW. 1992. Foraging strategies of spiders. TREE. 7:155-159.
  • Venner S, Bel-Venner MC, Pasquet A, Leborgne R. 2003. Body-mass-dependent cost of webbuilding behavior in an orb weaving spider, Zygiella x-notata. Naturwissenschaften. 90:269-272.
  • Wilder SM. 2011. Spider nutrition: an integrative perspective. Adv Insect Physiol. 40:87-136.