Journal article Open Access

The Utility of Comparative Area Studies for Historical Analysis

Ahmed, Amel

DataCite XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi="" xmlns="" xsi:schemaLocation="">
  <identifier identifierType="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.3946792</identifier>
      <creatorName>Ahmed, Amel</creatorName>
      <affiliation>University of Massachusetts, Amherst</affiliation>
    <title>The Utility of Comparative Area Studies for Historical Analysis</title>
    <subject>qualitative methods</subject>
    <date dateType="Issued">2020-08-21</date>
  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="JournalArticle"/>
    <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url"></alternateIdentifier>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="ISSN" relationType="IsPartOf">2153-6767</relatedIdentifier>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsVersionOf">10.5281/zenodo.3946791</relatedIdentifier>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsPartOf"></relatedIdentifier>
    <rights rightsURI="">Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International</rights>
    <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights>
    <description descriptionType="Abstract">&lt;p&gt;While focusing on particular countries or regions is indispensable for accumulating substantive knowledge, there are also costs to not stretching beyond a given geographic region when taking on &amp;ldquo;big&amp;rdquo; questions in the study of politics. The recent volume, &lt;em&gt;Comparative Area Studies: Methodological Rationales and Cross-Regional Applications &lt;/em&gt;(Ahram, K&amp;ouml;llner, and Sil 2018) identifies comparative area studies (CAS) as a distinct research strategy occupying unique intellectual spaces within the social sciences. As the contributions to the volume demonstrate, CAS has distinct advantages for developing mid-range theory, offering novel empirical findings and a different mode of triangulation. Such works can also serve an important disciplinary function by bringing into dialogue scholars that may be siloed off into various research communities. Moreover, they advance an important intellectual agenda in offering a mode of research that problematizes and denaturalizes our conceptions of geographical areas, and indeed, our understanding of what it means to compare.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
All versions This version
Views 102102
Downloads 5050
Data volume 8.0 MB8.0 MB
Unique views 9999
Unique downloads 4848


Cite as