June 15, 2020 Journal article Open Access

Camelbeeck, Thierry; Vanneste, Kris; Lecocq, Thomas

MARC21 XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <leader>00000nam##2200000uu#4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Earthquake Activity</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Intracontinental Regions</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Magnitude</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Seismic Risks</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20200811005922.0</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Paper presented at the meeting of the Section of Technical Sciences held on 22 February 2018. Text received on 13 November 2018 and submitted to peer review. Final version, approved by the reviewers, received on 14 May 2019.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="001">3894460</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Royal Observatory of Belgium</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Vanneste, Kris</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Royal Observatory of Belgium</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Lecocq, Thomas</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">1396653</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">md5:0906fb4af92af24b7cd554f95ac7afa2</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">https://zenodo.org/record/3894460/files/Bulletin_63_2_07-1_CAMELBEECK.PDF</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">open</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2020-06-15</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="p">openaire</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">oai:zenodo.org:3894460</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="c">321-340</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">Bulletin des Séances - Mededelingen der Zittingen</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">63</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Member of the Academy for Overseas Sciences of Belgium</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Camelbeeck, Thierry</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Natural and Man-induced Destructive Earthquakes in Stable Continental Regions</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/legalcode</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution No Derivatives 4.0 International</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">opendefinition.org</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">&lt;p&gt;Despite the real societal challenge posed by their important potential of destruction, the infrequent moderate and large earthquakes in tectonically-stable continental regions (SCR) have causes that are not well understood yet. Nevertheless, recent studies suggest that large earthquakes in SCR can be explained by transient disturbances of local crustal stress or fault strength because the tectonic loading on faults is very slow. In this paper, we assert that this new hypothesis is well supported by the observation that many moderate MW 5.5-6.0 SCR earthquakes are shallower than similar events in active regions. Moreover, by using the basic principles of frictional fault reactivation, we explain why these temporary stresses play a more fundamental role in the initiation of large earthquakes in SCR than at plate boundaries. As these disturbances in stresses can be related to natural environmental phenomena, but also to human activities, we also debate about the potential role of man-made earthquakes in SCR seismicity and seismic hazard. This discussion highlights the need to better understand the contribution of man-made earthquakes in the&lt;br&gt;
observed seismicity.&lt;/p&gt;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="n">doi</subfield>
    <subfield code="i">isVersionOf</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.3894459</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.3894460</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">publication</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">article</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>