Journal article Open Access

An Ottoman Commentary Tradition on Ghazālī's Tahāfut al-falāsifa. Preliminary Observations

Lit, L.W. Cornelis van


JSON Export

{
  "files": [
    {
      "links": {
        "self": "https://zenodo.org/api/files/a0322e63-b563-446f-9690-de5426cef229/2015.LWCvL%20An%20Ottoman%20Commentary%20Tradition%20Oriens.pdf"
      }, 
      "checksum": "md5:9dca6edc12302525fa59a9e6c70b6b6d", 
      "bucket": "a0322e63-b563-446f-9690-de5426cef229", 
      "key": "2015.LWCvL An Ottoman Commentary Tradition Oriens.pdf", 
      "type": "pdf", 
      "size": 347046
    }
  ], 
  "owners": [
    73870
  ], 
  "doi": "10.1163/18778372-04303004", 
  "stats": {
    "version_unique_downloads": 5.0, 
    "unique_views": 6.0, 
    "views": 7.0, 
    "version_views": 7.0, 
    "unique_downloads": 5.0, 
    "version_unique_views": 6.0, 
    "volume": 2429322.0, 
    "version_downloads": 7.0, 
    "downloads": 7.0, 
    "version_volume": 2429322.0
  }, 
  "links": {
    "doi": "https://doi.org/10.1163/18778372-04303004", 
    "latest_html": "https://zenodo.org/record/3757131", 
    "bucket": "https://zenodo.org/api/files/a0322e63-b563-446f-9690-de5426cef229", 
    "badge": "https://zenodo.org/badge/doi/10.1163/18778372-04303004.svg", 
    "html": "https://zenodo.org/record/3757131", 
    "latest": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/3757131"
  }, 
  "created": "2020-04-19T12:09:53.179618+00:00", 
  "updated": "2020-04-20T20:20:16.524388+00:00", 
  "conceptrecid": "3757130", 
  "revision": 3, 
  "id": 3757131, 
  "metadata": {
    "access_right_category": "success", 
    "doi": "10.1163/18778372-04303004", 
    "description": "<p>Ghaz\u0101l\u012b&rsquo;s &ldquo;The incoherence of the philosophers&rdquo; spurred a counter-commentary by Ibn Rushd, as is well known. Up to ten texts from Ottoman scholars also purport to be commentaries on the&nbsp;Tah\u0101fut, constituting a commentary tradition that has been neglected by scholars. The first two commentators, Khojaz\u0101da (d. 1488) and \u02bfAl\u0101\u02be al-D\u012bn \u1e6c\u016bs\u012b (d. 1482), are not line-by-line exegetes of Ghaz\u0101l\u012b, but rather update the discussions that Ghaz\u0101l\u012b broached to the level of knowledge available to them. Khojaz\u0101da was favored by the Ottomans, but \u02bfAl\u0101\u02be al-D\u012bn&rsquo;s content, methodology and argumentation style proves to be just as, if not more, interesting for us.</p>", 
    "license": {
      "id": "CC-BY-4.0"
    }, 
    "title": "An Ottoman Commentary Tradition on Ghaz\u0101l\u012b's Tah\u0101fut al-fal\u0101sifa. Preliminary Observations", 
    "relations": {
      "version": [
        {
          "count": 1, 
          "index": 0, 
          "parent": {
            "pid_type": "recid", 
            "pid_value": "3757130"
          }, 
          "is_last": true, 
          "last_child": {
            "pid_type": "recid", 
            "pid_value": "3757131"
          }
        }
      ]
    }, 
    "communities": [
      {
        "id": "islam"
      }
    ], 
    "publication_date": "2020-04-19", 
    "creators": [
      {
        "orcid": "0000-0003-1846-4703", 
        "affiliation": "Utrecht University", 
        "name": "Lit, L.W. Cornelis van"
      }
    ], 
    "access_right": "open", 
    "resource_type": {
      "subtype": "article", 
      "type": "publication", 
      "title": "Journal article"
    }
  }
}
7
7
views
downloads
Views 7
Downloads 7
Data volume 2.4 MB
Unique views 6
Unique downloads 5

Share

Cite as